The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 47 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
As of 1 July 2024, you may notice a temporary increase in the numbers of X profiles with Unknown location. Click here to learn more.
| Title |
Formula versus donor breast milk for feeding preterm or low birth weight infants
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Cochrane database of systematic reviews, July 2019
|
| DOI | 10.1002/14651858.cd002971.pub5 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Maria Quigley, Nicholas D Embleton, William McGuire |
X Demographics
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United Kingdom | 7 | 15% |
| Malaysia | 2 | 4% |
| Canada | 2 | 4% |
| Germany | 2 | 4% |
| United States | 2 | 4% |
| France | 1 | 2% |
| Ireland | 1 | 2% |
| Argentina | 1 | 2% |
| Comoros | 1 | 2% |
| Other | 1 | 2% |
| Unknown | 27 | 57% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 35 | 74% |
| Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 7 | 15% |
| Scientists | 3 | 6% |
| Science communicators (journalists, bloggers, editors) | 2 | 4% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 486 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 486 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Bachelor | 65 | 13% |
| Researcher | 41 | 8% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 37 | 8% |
| Student > Master | 37 | 8% |
| Other | 26 | 5% |
| Other | 78 | 16% |
| Unknown | 202 | 42% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Medicine and Dentistry | 108 | 22% |
| Nursing and Health Professions | 73 | 15% |
| Social Sciences | 13 | 3% |
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 11 | 2% |
| Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology | 9 | 2% |
| Other | 45 | 9% |
| Unknown | 227 | 47% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 60. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 08 February 2024.
All research outputs
#746,510
of 26,184,649 outputs
Outputs from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#1,316
of 13,192 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#15,388
of 360,975 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#15
of 166 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 26,184,649 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 97th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 13,192 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 34.8. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 90% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 360,975 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 95% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 166 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 90% of its contemporaries.