↓ Skip to main content

Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews

Nutrient-enriched formula versus standard formula for preterm infants

Overview of attention for article published in Cochrane database of systematic reviews, July 2019
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 5% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (91st percentile)
  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (66th percentile)

Mentioned by

news
1 news outlet
blogs
1 blog
twitter
25 tweeters
facebook
2 Facebook pages

Citations

dimensions_citation
7 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
144 Mendeley
Title
Nutrient-enriched formula versus standard formula for preterm infants
Published in
Cochrane database of systematic reviews, July 2019
DOI 10.1002/14651858.cd004204.pub3
Pubmed ID
Authors

Verena Walsh, Jennifer Valeska Elli Brown, Lisa M Askie, Nicholas D Embleton, William McGuire

Twitter Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 25 tweeters who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 144 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 144 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 25 17%
Student > Bachelor 22 15%
Researcher 18 13%
Student > Ph. D. Student 14 10%
Student > Postgraduate 9 6%
Other 25 17%
Unknown 31 22%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 44 31%
Nursing and Health Professions 31 22%
Social Sciences 5 3%
Psychology 4 3%
Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science 4 3%
Other 12 8%
Unknown 44 31%

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 29. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 11 September 2021.
All research outputs
#924,761
of 18,905,383 outputs
Outputs from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#2,295
of 11,887 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#21,846
of 272,424 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#14
of 39 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 18,905,383 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 95th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 11,887 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 26.7. This one has done well, scoring higher than 80% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 272,424 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 91% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 39 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 66% of its contemporaries.