↓ Skip to main content

Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews

Nutrient-enriched formula versus standard formula for preterm infants

Overview of attention for article published in Cochrane database of systematic reviews, July 2019
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 5% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (93rd percentile)
  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (78th percentile)

Mentioned by

news
1 news outlet
blogs
1 blog
policy
1 policy source
twitter
24 tweeters
facebook
2 Facebook pages
wikipedia
1 Wikipedia page

Citations

dimensions_citation
16 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
215 Mendeley
Title
Nutrient-enriched formula versus standard formula for preterm infants
Published in
Cochrane database of systematic reviews, July 2019
DOI 10.1002/14651858.cd004204.pub3
Pubmed ID
Authors

Verena Walsh, Jennifer Valeska Elli Brown, Lisa M Askie, Nicholas D Embleton, William McGuire

Twitter Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 24 tweeters who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 215 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 215 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 28 13%
Student > Bachelor 27 13%
Researcher 20 9%
Student > Ph. D. Student 15 7%
Other 11 5%
Other 42 20%
Unknown 72 33%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 47 22%
Nursing and Health Professions 35 16%
Unspecified 12 6%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 5 2%
Social Sciences 5 2%
Other 24 11%
Unknown 87 40%

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 35. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 01 January 2022.
All research outputs
#1,011,050
of 23,340,595 outputs
Outputs from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#2,235
of 12,632 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#21,802
of 316,361 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#37
of 164 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,340,595 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 95th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 12,632 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 32.9. This one has done well, scoring higher than 82% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 316,361 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 93% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 164 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 78% of its contemporaries.