↓ Skip to main content

Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews

Nutrient‐enriched formula versus standard formula for preterm infants

Overview of attention for article published in Cochrane database of systematic reviews, July 2019
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 5% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (92nd percentile)
  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (78th percentile)

Mentioned by

news
1 news outlet
blogs
1 blog
policy
1 policy source
twitter
23 X users
facebook
2 Facebook pages
wikipedia
1 Wikipedia page

Citations

dimensions_citation
23 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
274 Mendeley
Title
Nutrient‐enriched formula versus standard formula for preterm infants
Published in
Cochrane database of systematic reviews, July 2019
DOI 10.1002/14651858.cd004204.pub3
Pubmed ID
Authors

Verena Walsh, Jennifer Valeska Elli Brown, Lisa M Askie, Nicholas D Embleton, William McGuire

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 23 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 274 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 274 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Bachelor 32 12%
Student > Master 28 10%
Researcher 23 8%
Student > Ph. D. Student 17 6%
Unspecified 16 6%
Other 49 18%
Unknown 109 40%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 53 19%
Nursing and Health Professions 37 14%
Unspecified 16 6%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 6 2%
Social Sciences 5 2%
Other 27 10%
Unknown 130 47%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 34. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 15 November 2022.
All research outputs
#1,179,068
of 25,595,500 outputs
Outputs from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#2,454
of 13,156 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#24,262
of 344,235 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#36
of 164 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,595,500 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 95th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 13,156 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 35.8. This one has done well, scoring higher than 81% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 344,235 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 92% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 164 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 78% of its contemporaries.