The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 77 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
As of 1 July 2024, you may notice a temporary increase in the numbers of X profiles with Unknown location. Click here to learn more.
| Title |
Work‐break schedules for preventing musculoskeletal symptoms and disorders in healthy workers
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Cochrane database of systematic reviews, July 2019
|
| DOI | 10.1002/14651858.cd012886.pub2 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Tessy Luger, Christopher G Maher, Monika A Rieger, Benjamin Steinhilber |
X Demographics
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United Kingdom | 5 | 6% |
| Spain | 4 | 5% |
| Finland | 4 | 5% |
| France | 2 | 3% |
| Nigeria | 1 | 1% |
| Australia | 1 | 1% |
| Portugal | 1 | 1% |
| Belgium | 1 | 1% |
| Denmark | 1 | 1% |
| Other | 5 | 6% |
| Unknown | 52 | 68% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 60 | 78% |
| Scientists | 9 | 12% |
| Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 7 | 9% |
| Science communicators (journalists, bloggers, editors) | 1 | 1% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 525 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 525 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Bachelor | 61 | 12% |
| Student > Master | 52 | 10% |
| Researcher | 43 | 8% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 43 | 8% |
| Student > Postgraduate | 25 | 5% |
| Other | 85 | 16% |
| Unknown | 216 | 41% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Nursing and Health Professions | 82 | 16% |
| Medicine and Dentistry | 80 | 15% |
| Engineering | 19 | 4% |
| Psychology | 17 | 3% |
| Sports and Recreations | 16 | 3% |
| Other | 78 | 15% |
| Unknown | 233 | 44% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 49. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 21 February 2024.
All research outputs
#915,200
of 26,560,982 outputs
Outputs from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#1,640
of 13,244 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#18,565
of 362,832 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#21
of 169 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 26,560,982 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 96th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 13,244 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 35.7. This one has done well, scoring higher than 87% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 362,832 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 94% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 169 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 87% of its contemporaries.