The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 25 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
As of 1 July 2024, you may notice a temporary increase in the numbers of X profiles with Unknown location. Click here to learn more.
Title |
Advanced sperm selection techniques for assisted reproduction
|
---|---|
Published in |
Cochrane database of systematic reviews, July 2019
|
DOI | 10.1002/14651858.cd010461.pub3 |
Pubmed ID | |
Authors |
Sam Lepine, Simon McDowell, Leigh M Searle, Ben Kroon, Demián Glujovsky, Anusch Yazdani |
X Demographics
Geographical breakdown
Country | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
United Kingdom | 2 | 8% |
Australia | 1 | 4% |
France | 1 | 4% |
United States | 1 | 4% |
Brazil | 1 | 4% |
Netherlands | 1 | 4% |
Spain | 1 | 4% |
Unknown | 17 | 68% |
Demographic breakdown
Type | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Members of the public | 18 | 72% |
Scientists | 4 | 16% |
Science communicators (journalists, bloggers, editors) | 2 | 8% |
Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 1 | 4% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 237 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
Country | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Canada | 1 | <1% |
Unknown | 236 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Student > Bachelor | 27 | 11% |
Researcher | 26 | 11% |
Other | 20 | 8% |
Student > Master | 20 | 8% |
Student > Ph. D. Student | 17 | 7% |
Other | 38 | 16% |
Unknown | 89 | 38% |
Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Medicine and Dentistry | 56 | 24% |
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology | 20 | 8% |
Nursing and Health Professions | 19 | 8% |
Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 14 | 6% |
Unspecified | 6 | 3% |
Other | 24 | 10% |
Unknown | 98 | 41% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 25. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 28 May 2022.
All research outputs
#1,618,240
of 26,178,577 outputs
Outputs from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#3,299
of 13,190 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#32,989
of 361,788 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#40
of 175 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 26,178,577 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 93rd percentile: it's in the top 10% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 13,190 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 33.6. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 74% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 361,788 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 90% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 175 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 77% of its contemporaries.