↓ Skip to main content

Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews

Antiseptics for burns

Overview of attention for article published in Cochrane database of systematic reviews, July 2017
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 5% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (94th percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (81st percentile)

Mentioned by

news
1 news outlet
twitter
57 tweeters
facebook
7 Facebook pages
wikipedia
2 Wikipedia pages

Citations

dimensions_citation
85 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
477 Mendeley
Title
Antiseptics for burns
Published in
Cochrane database of systematic reviews, July 2017
DOI 10.1002/14651858.cd011821.pub2
Pubmed ID
Authors

Gill Norman, Janice Christie, Zhenmi Liu, Maggie J Westby, Jayne M Jefferies, Thomas Hudson, Jacky Edwards, Devi Prasad Mohapatra, Ibrahim A Hassan, Jo C Dumville

Twitter Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 57 tweeters who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 477 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 477 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Bachelor 74 16%
Student > Master 61 13%
Researcher 40 8%
Student > Postgraduate 36 8%
Other 25 5%
Other 88 18%
Unknown 153 32%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 141 30%
Nursing and Health Professions 57 12%
Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science 24 5%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 11 2%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 10 2%
Other 63 13%
Unknown 171 36%

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 47. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 20 December 2022.
All research outputs
#777,049
of 23,383,275 outputs
Outputs from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#1,609
of 12,656 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#17,440
of 313,601 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#50
of 268 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,383,275 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 96th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 12,656 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 33.0. This one has done well, scoring higher than 87% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 313,601 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 94% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 268 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 81% of its contemporaries.