↓ Skip to main content

Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews

Anti-pseudomonal beta-lactams for the initial, empirical, treatment of febrile neutropenia: comparison of beta-lactams

Overview of attention for article published in Cochrane database of systematic reviews, November 2010
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (94th percentile)
  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (77th percentile)

Mentioned by

news
1 news outlet
policy
1 policy source
twitter
8 tweeters
wikipedia
4 Wikipedia pages

Citations

dimensions_citation
75 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
166 Mendeley
Title
Anti-pseudomonal beta-lactams for the initial, empirical, treatment of febrile neutropenia: comparison of beta-lactams
Published in
Cochrane database of systematic reviews, November 2010
DOI 10.1002/14651858.cd005197.pub3
Pubmed ID
Authors

Mical Paul, Dafna Yahav, Assaf Bivas, Abigail Fraser, Leonard Leibovici

Twitter Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 8 tweeters who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 166 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United Kingdom 1 <1%
Mexico 1 <1%
Chile 1 <1%
Norway 1 <1%
Unknown 162 98%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 24 14%
Researcher 20 12%
Student > Bachelor 16 10%
Other 12 7%
Student > Ph. D. Student 12 7%
Other 43 26%
Unknown 39 23%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 79 48%
Nursing and Health Professions 10 6%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 8 5%
Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science 7 4%
Immunology and Microbiology 7 4%
Other 13 8%
Unknown 42 25%

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 20. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 27 December 2022.
All research outputs
#1,577,650
of 22,994,508 outputs
Outputs from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#3,601
of 12,348 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#5,966
of 101,630 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#19
of 86 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,994,508 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 93rd percentile: it's in the top 10% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 12,348 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 30.6. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 70% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 101,630 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 94% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 86 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 77% of its contemporaries.