↓ Skip to main content

Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews

Financial conflicts of interest in systematic reviews: associations with results, conclusions, and methodological quality

Overview of attention for article published in Cochrane database of systematic reviews, August 2019
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 5% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (98th percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (97th percentile)

Mentioned by

blogs
1 blog
twitter
220 tweeters
facebook
5 Facebook pages
wikipedia
1 Wikipedia page

Citations

dimensions_citation
25 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
70 Mendeley
Title
Financial conflicts of interest in systematic reviews: associations with results, conclusions, and methodological quality
Published in
Cochrane database of systematic reviews, August 2019
DOI 10.1002/14651858.mr000047.pub2
Pubmed ID
Authors

Camilla Hansen, Andreas Lundh, Kristine Rasmussen, Asbjørn Hróbjartsson

Twitter Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 220 tweeters who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 70 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 70 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 15 21%
Student > Bachelor 10 14%
Researcher 8 11%
Student > Ph. D. Student 5 7%
Other 4 6%
Other 10 14%
Unknown 18 26%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 18 26%
Nursing and Health Professions 11 16%
Social Sciences 5 7%
Psychology 2 3%
Philosophy 2 3%
Other 8 11%
Unknown 24 34%

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 142. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 11 October 2021.
All research outputs
#195,263
of 19,914,721 outputs
Outputs from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#338
of 11,997 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#4,338
of 278,458 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#2
of 37 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 19,914,721 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 99th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 11,997 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 27.8. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 97% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 278,458 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 98% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 37 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 97% of its contemporaries.