↓ Skip to main content

Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews

Long-term neurocognitive and other side effects of radiotherapy, with or without chemotherapy, for glioma

Overview of attention for article published in Cochrane database of systematic reviews, August 2019
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (85th percentile)
  • Above-average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (53rd percentile)

Mentioned by

twitter
21 tweeters
facebook
3 Facebook pages
wikipedia
1 Wikipedia page

Citations

dimensions_citation
50 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
278 Mendeley
Title
Long-term neurocognitive and other side effects of radiotherapy, with or without chemotherapy, for glioma
Published in
Cochrane database of systematic reviews, August 2019
DOI 10.1002/14651858.cd013047.pub2
Pubmed ID
Authors

Theresa A Lawrie, David Gillespie, Therese Dowswell, Jonathan Evans, Sara Erridge, Luke Vale, Ashleigh Kernohan, Robin Grant

Twitter Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 21 tweeters who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 278 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 278 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Bachelor 38 14%
Student > Master 37 13%
Researcher 28 10%
Other 25 9%
Student > Ph. D. Student 22 8%
Other 48 17%
Unknown 80 29%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 88 32%
Nursing and Health Professions 21 8%
Neuroscience 15 5%
Psychology 13 5%
Unspecified 8 3%
Other 39 14%
Unknown 94 34%

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 14. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 22 March 2021.
All research outputs
#1,924,586
of 20,550,211 outputs
Outputs from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#4,397
of 12,076 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#40,293
of 280,361 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#19
of 39 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 20,550,211 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 90th percentile: it's in the top 10% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 12,076 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 28.2. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 63% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 280,361 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 85% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 39 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 53% of its contemporaries.