↓ Skip to main content

Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews

Surgery versus thrombolysis for initial management of acute limb ischaemia

Overview of attention for article published in Cochrane database of systematic reviews, August 2018
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

twitter
1 tweeter

Citations

dimensions_citation
18 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
169 Mendeley
Title
Surgery versus thrombolysis for initial management of acute limb ischaemia
Published in
Cochrane database of systematic reviews, August 2018
DOI 10.1002/14651858.cd002784.pub3
Pubmed ID
Authors

Rosemary Darwood, David C Berridge, David O Kessel, Iain Robertson, Rachel Forster

Twitter Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 tweeter who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 169 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Japan 1 <1%
Singapore 1 <1%
Unknown 167 99%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 28 17%
Student > Bachelor 20 12%
Researcher 19 11%
Student > Postgraduate 18 11%
Other 15 9%
Other 38 22%
Unknown 31 18%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 90 53%
Nursing and Health Professions 12 7%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 6 4%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 5 3%
Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science 5 3%
Other 12 7%
Unknown 39 23%

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 11 August 2019.
All research outputs
#13,794,426
of 15,634,343 outputs
Outputs from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#10,910
of 11,227 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#219,231
of 262,748 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#38
of 38 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 15,634,343 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 11,227 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 23.3. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 262,748 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 38 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.