↓ Skip to main content

Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews

One-to-one dietary interventions undertaken in a dental setting to change dietary behaviour

Overview of attention for article published in Cochrane database of systematic reviews, March 2012
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (93rd percentile)
  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (74th percentile)

Mentioned by

twitter
29 tweeters
facebook
1 Facebook page

Citations

dimensions_citation
95 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
471 Mendeley
Title
One-to-one dietary interventions undertaken in a dental setting to change dietary behaviour
Published in
Cochrane database of systematic reviews, March 2012
DOI 10.1002/14651858.cd006540.pub2
Pubmed ID
Authors

Rebecca Harris, Ana Gamboa, Yvonne Dailey, Angela Ashcroft

Abstract

The dental care setting is an appropriate place to deliver dietary assessment and advice as part of patient management. However, we do not know whether this is effective in changing dietary behaviour.

Twitter Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 29 tweeters who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 471 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
France 1 <1%
Ireland 1 <1%
Australia 1 <1%
Brazil 1 <1%
United Kingdom 1 <1%
Canada 1 <1%
New Zealand 1 <1%
Unknown 464 99%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 80 17%
Student > Bachelor 57 12%
Researcher 54 11%
Student > Ph. D. Student 50 11%
Student > Postgraduate 38 8%
Other 87 18%
Unknown 105 22%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 215 46%
Nursing and Health Professions 34 7%
Psychology 23 5%
Social Sciences 22 5%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 10 2%
Other 40 8%
Unknown 127 27%

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 18. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 14 October 2022.
All research outputs
#1,767,433
of 22,867,327 outputs
Outputs from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#3,959
of 12,325 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#10,573
of 156,934 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#47
of 182 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,867,327 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 92nd percentile: it's in the top 10% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 12,325 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 30.5. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 67% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 156,934 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 93% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 182 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 74% of its contemporaries.