↓ Skip to main content

Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews

One-to-one dietary interventions undertaken in a dental setting to change dietary behaviour

Overview of attention for article published in Cochrane database of systematic reviews, March 2012
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (92nd percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (82nd percentile)

Mentioned by

twitter
24 tweeters
facebook
1 Facebook page

Citations

dimensions_citation
77 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
414 Mendeley
Title
One-to-one dietary interventions undertaken in a dental setting to change dietary behaviour
Published in
Cochrane database of systematic reviews, March 2012
DOI 10.1002/14651858.cd006540.pub2
Pubmed ID
Authors

Rebecca Harris, Ana Gamboa, Yvonne Dailey, Angela Ashcroft

Abstract

The dental care setting is an appropriate place to deliver dietary assessment and advice as part of patient management. However, we do not know whether this is effective in changing dietary behaviour.

Twitter Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 24 tweeters who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 414 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
France 1 <1%
Ireland 1 <1%
Australia 1 <1%
Brazil 1 <1%
United Kingdom 1 <1%
Canada 1 <1%
New Zealand 1 <1%
Unknown 407 98%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 76 18%
Student > Bachelor 50 12%
Researcher 49 12%
Student > Ph. D. Student 48 12%
Student > Postgraduate 34 8%
Other 81 20%
Unknown 76 18%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 197 48%
Nursing and Health Professions 33 8%
Social Sciences 21 5%
Psychology 20 5%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 11 3%
Other 36 9%
Unknown 96 23%

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 15. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 10 May 2021.
All research outputs
#1,651,487
of 18,978,726 outputs
Outputs from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#3,934
of 11,901 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#10,698
of 134,596 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#21
of 114 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 18,978,726 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 91st percentile: it's in the top 10% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 11,901 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 26.8. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 66% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 134,596 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 92% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 114 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 82% of its contemporaries.