↓ Skip to main content

Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews

One-to-one dietary interventions undertaken in a dental setting to change dietary behaviour

Overview of attention for article published in Cochrane database of systematic reviews, March 2012
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (91st percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (81st percentile)

Mentioned by

twitter
23 tweeters
facebook
1 Facebook page

Citations

dimensions_citation
78 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
412 Mendeley
Title
One-to-one dietary interventions undertaken in a dental setting to change dietary behaviour
Published in
Cochrane database of systematic reviews, March 2012
DOI 10.1002/14651858.cd006540.pub2
Pubmed ID
Authors

Rebecca Harris, Ana Gamboa, Yvonne Dailey, Angela Ashcroft

Abstract

The dental care setting is an appropriate place to deliver dietary assessment and advice as part of patient management. However, we do not know whether this is effective in changing dietary behaviour.

Twitter Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 23 tweeters who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 412 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
France 1 <1%
Ireland 1 <1%
Australia 1 <1%
Brazil 1 <1%
United Kingdom 1 <1%
Canada 1 <1%
New Zealand 1 <1%
Unknown 405 98%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 75 18%
Student > Bachelor 50 12%
Researcher 49 12%
Student > Ph. D. Student 48 12%
Student > Postgraduate 34 8%
Other 80 19%
Unknown 76 18%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 196 48%
Nursing and Health Professions 33 8%
Social Sciences 21 5%
Psychology 19 5%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 11 3%
Other 36 9%
Unknown 96 23%

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 15. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 10 May 2021.
All research outputs
#1,684,681
of 18,891,791 outputs
Outputs from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#4,021
of 11,887 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#10,987
of 134,474 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#22
of 114 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 18,891,791 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 91st percentile: it's in the top 10% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 11,887 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 26.7. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 66% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 134,474 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 91% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 114 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 81% of its contemporaries.