The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 29 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
As of 1 July 2024, you may notice a temporary increase in the numbers of X profiles with Unknown location. Click here to learn more.
| Title |
One‐to‐one dietary interventions undertaken in a dental setting to change dietary behaviour
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Cochrane database of systematic reviews, March 2012
|
| DOI | 10.1002/14651858.cd006540.pub2 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Rebecca Harris, Ana Gamboa, Yvonne Dailey, Angela Ashcroft |
| Abstract |
The dental care setting is an appropriate place to deliver dietary assessment and advice as part of patient management. However, we do not know whether this is effective in changing dietary behaviour. |
X Demographics
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United Kingdom | 5 | 17% |
| Canada | 2 | 7% |
| Spain | 2 | 7% |
| Chile | 1 | 3% |
| United States | 1 | 3% |
| Ireland | 1 | 3% |
| Netherlands | 1 | 3% |
| Unknown | 16 | 55% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 20 | 69% |
| Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 7 | 24% |
| Scientists | 2 | 7% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 535 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| France | 1 | <1% |
| Ireland | 1 | <1% |
| Australia | 1 | <1% |
| Brazil | 1 | <1% |
| United Kingdom | 1 | <1% |
| Canada | 1 | <1% |
| New Zealand | 1 | <1% |
| Unknown | 528 | 99% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Master | 85 | 16% |
| Researcher | 56 | 10% |
| Student > Bachelor | 56 | 10% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 52 | 10% |
| Student > Postgraduate | 39 | 7% |
| Other | 93 | 17% |
| Unknown | 154 | 29% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Medicine and Dentistry | 222 | 41% |
| Nursing and Health Professions | 37 | 7% |
| Psychology | 23 | 4% |
| Social Sciences | 22 | 4% |
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 11 | 2% |
| Other | 41 | 8% |
| Unknown | 179 | 33% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 18. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 14 October 2022.
All research outputs
#2,141,652
of 26,370,291 outputs
Outputs from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#4,333
of 13,211 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#11,714
of 170,687 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#51
of 186 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 26,370,291 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 91st percentile: it's in the top 10% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 13,211 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 35.7. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 67% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 170,687 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 93% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 186 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 72% of its contemporaries.