The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 18 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
As of 1 July 2024, you may notice a temporary increase in the numbers of X profiles with Unknown location. Click here to learn more.
| Title |
Sensory environment on health‐related outcomes of hospital patients
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Cochrane database of systematic reviews, March 2012
|
| DOI | 10.1002/14651858.cd005315.pub2 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Amy Drahota, Derek Ward, Heather Mackenzie, Rebecca Stores, Bernie Higgins, Diane Gal, Taraneh P Dean |
| Abstract |
Hospital environments have recently received renewed interest, with considerable investments into building and renovating healthcare estates. Understanding the effectiveness of environmental interventions is important for resource utilisation and providing quality care. |
X Demographics
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United States | 8 | 44% |
| United Kingdom | 2 | 11% |
| Philippines | 1 | 6% |
| Unknown | 7 | 39% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 12 | 67% |
| Scientists | 3 | 17% |
| Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 3 | 17% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 1,131 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United Kingdom | 4 | <1% |
| Iran, Islamic Republic of | 2 | <1% |
| France | 1 | <1% |
| South Africa | 1 | <1% |
| Ireland | 1 | <1% |
| Chile | 1 | <1% |
| Canada | 1 | <1% |
| Denmark | 1 | <1% |
| United States | 1 | <1% |
| Other | 1 | <1% |
| Unknown | 1117 | 99% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Master | 180 | 16% |
| Student > Bachelor | 125 | 11% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 118 | 10% |
| Researcher | 117 | 10% |
| Student > Postgraduate | 54 | 5% |
| Other | 185 | 16% |
| Unknown | 352 | 31% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Medicine and Dentistry | 319 | 28% |
| Nursing and Health Professions | 114 | 10% |
| Psychology | 73 | 6% |
| Social Sciences | 40 | 4% |
| Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology | 20 | 2% |
| Other | 170 | 15% |
| Unknown | 395 | 35% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 26. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 28 March 2024.
All research outputs
#1,523,549
of 25,984,873 outputs
Outputs from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#3,117
of 13,170 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#7,874
of 170,023 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#30
of 186 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,984,873 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 94th percentile: it's in the top 10% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 13,170 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 33.3. This one has done well, scoring higher than 76% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 170,023 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 95% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 186 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 83% of its contemporaries.