High‐frequency oscillatory ventilation versus conventional ventilation for acute respiratory distress syndrome

Overview of attention for article published in Cochrane database of systematic reviews, April 2016

Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (92nd percentile)
Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (68th percentile)

Mentioned by

blogs: 2 blogs
policy: 1 policy source

twitter: 19 X users
facebook: 4 Facebook pages

Citations

dimensions_citation: 57 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley: 285 Mendeley

Summary Blogs Policy documents X Facebook Dimensions citations

So far, Dimensions has found 57 publications that cite this research output.

57

The most recent citing publications are shown below. View all 57 publications that cite this research output on Dimensions.

Recruitment-Potential-Oriented Mechanical Ventilation Protocol and Narrative Review for Patients with Acute Respiratory Distress Syndrome

Article in Journal of Personalized Medicine (July 2024)

Comparison of venovenous extracorporeal membrane oxygenation, prone position and supine mechanical ventilation for severely hypoxemic acute respiratory distress syndrome: a network meta-analysis

Article in Intensive Care Medicine (June 2024)

The outcome of high-frequency oscillatory ventilation in pediatric patients with acute respiratory distress syndrome in an intensive care unit

Article in Annals of Saudi Medicine (September 2023)