↓ Skip to main content

Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews

Best first‐line therapy for patients with advanced non‐small cell lung cancer, performance status 2 without a targetable mutation or with an unknown mutation status

Overview of attention for article published in Cochrane database of systematic reviews, August 2019
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age

Mentioned by

twitter
3 X users

Citations

dimensions_citation
3 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
17 Mendeley
Title
Best first‐line therapy for patients with advanced non‐small cell lung cancer, performance status 2 without a targetable mutation or with an unknown mutation status
Published in
Cochrane database of systematic reviews, August 2019
DOI 10.1002/14651858.cd013382
Authors

Rolof GP Gijtenbeek, Kim de Jong, Ben JW Venmans, Femke HM van Vollenhoven, Anneke Ten Brinke, Anthonie J Van der Wekken, Wouter H van Geffen

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 3 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 17 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 17 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Bachelor 3 18%
Student > Postgraduate 2 12%
Student > Master 2 12%
Other 1 6%
Student > Ph. D. Student 1 6%
Other 0 0%
Unknown 8 47%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 4 24%
Nursing and Health Professions 2 12%
Neuroscience 1 6%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 1 6%
Unknown 9 53%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 2. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 20 August 2019.
All research outputs
#16,416,944
of 25,922,020 outputs
Outputs from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#11,225
of 13,165 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#203,503
of 356,733 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#148
of 170 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,922,020 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 34th percentile – i.e., 34% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 13,165 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 34.5. This one is in the 13th percentile – i.e., 13% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 356,733 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 40th percentile – i.e., 40% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 170 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 11th percentile – i.e., 11% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.