↓ Skip to main content

Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews

Tricyclic antidepressants for autism spectrum disorders (ASD) in children and adolescents

Overview of attention for article published in Cochrane database of systematic reviews, March 2012
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (95th percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (84th percentile)

Mentioned by

blogs
1 blog
policy
2 policy sources
twitter
8 X users
facebook
1 Facebook page
wikipedia
3 Wikipedia pages
googleplus
1 Google+ user

Citations

dimensions_citation
85 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
368 Mendeley
Title
Tricyclic antidepressants for autism spectrum disorders (ASD) in children and adolescents
Published in
Cochrane database of systematic reviews, March 2012
DOI 10.1002/14651858.cd008372.pub2
Pubmed ID
Authors

Romy Hurwitz, Roger Blackmore, Philip Hazell, Katrina Williams, Susan Woolfenden

Abstract

Autism spectrum disorders (ASD) are a heterogeneous group of neurodevelopmental disorders, ranging in severity and characterised by early onset of delay and deviance in the development of social interaction, and verbal and nonverbal communication. ASD is associated with restricted and/or stereotyped interests or behaviours. Tricyclic antidepressants (TCAs) block noradrenaline and serotonin reuptake, increasing the availability of these neurotransmitters in the central nervous system. Via their impact on serotonin, TCAs have been used in the treatment of autistic symptoms and comorbidities in individuals with ASD.  

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 8 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 368 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
France 2 <1%
Netherlands 1 <1%
South Africa 1 <1%
Canada 1 <1%
United States 1 <1%
Unknown 362 98%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 64 17%
Researcher 41 11%
Student > Ph. D. Student 35 10%
Student > Postgraduate 30 8%
Student > Bachelor 30 8%
Other 78 21%
Unknown 90 24%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 108 29%
Psychology 45 12%
Nursing and Health Professions 25 7%
Social Sciences 17 5%
Unspecified 15 4%
Other 58 16%
Unknown 100 27%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 26. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 24 March 2021.
All research outputs
#1,464,595
of 25,381,783 outputs
Outputs from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#3,159
of 12,999 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#7,605
of 163,558 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#29
of 185 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,381,783 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 94th percentile: it's in the top 10% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 12,999 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 35.8. This one has done well, scoring higher than 75% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 163,558 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 95% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 185 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 84% of its contemporaries.