The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 5 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
As of 1 July 2024, you may notice a temporary increase in the numbers of X profiles with Unknown location. Click here to learn more.
| Title |
Regular treatment with formoterol versus regular treatment with salmeterol for chronic asthma: serious adverse events
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Cochrane database of systematic reviews, March 2012
|
| DOI | 10.1002/14651858.cd007695.pub3 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Christopher J Cates, Toby J Lasserson |
| Abstract |
An increase in serious adverse events with both regular formoterol and regular salmeterol in chronic asthma has been demonstrated in previous Cochrane reviews. |
X Demographics
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Germany | 1 | 20% |
| Unknown | 4 | 80% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 5 | 100% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 169 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United Kingdom | 2 | 1% |
| Colombia | 1 | <1% |
| Germany | 1 | <1% |
| Unknown | 165 | 98% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Master | 22 | 13% |
| Researcher | 16 | 9% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 14 | 8% |
| Student > Bachelor | 14 | 8% |
| Other | 10 | 6% |
| Other | 27 | 16% |
| Unknown | 66 | 39% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Medicine and Dentistry | 52 | 31% |
| Nursing and Health Professions | 17 | 10% |
| Psychology | 7 | 4% |
| Social Sciences | 6 | 4% |
| Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science | 5 | 3% |
| Other | 11 | 7% |
| Unknown | 71 | 42% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 2. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 16 November 2020.
All research outputs
#16,064,263
of 25,850,671 outputs
Outputs from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#11,098
of 13,147 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#102,534
of 169,925 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#147
of 186 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,850,671 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 36th percentile – i.e., 36% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 13,147 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 34.5. This one is in the 14th percentile – i.e., 14% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 169,925 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 38th percentile – i.e., 38% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 186 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 20th percentile – i.e., 20% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.