| Title |
Nucleic acid and antigen detection tests for leptospirosis
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Cochrane database of systematic reviews, August 2019
|
| DOI | 10.1002/14651858.cd011871.pub2 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Bada Yang, Sophia G de Vries, Ahmed, Benjamin J Visser, Ingeborg M Nagel, René Spijker, Martin P Grobusch, Rudy A Hartskeerl, Marga GA Goris, Mariska MG Leeflang |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 2 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Comoros | 1 | 50% |
| Unknown | 1 | 50% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Scientists | 1 | 50% |
| Members of the public | 1 | 50% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 152 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 152 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Master | 27 | 18% |
| Student > Bachelor | 19 | 13% |
| Other | 15 | 10% |
| Researcher | 13 | 9% |
| Student > Doctoral Student | 7 | 5% |
| Other | 19 | 13% |
| Unknown | 52 | 34% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Medicine and Dentistry | 44 | 29% |
| Veterinary Science and Veterinary Medicine | 9 | 6% |
| Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology | 7 | 5% |
| Nursing and Health Professions | 7 | 5% |
| Immunology and Microbiology | 5 | 3% |
| Other | 22 | 14% |
| Unknown | 58 | 38% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 2. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 10 September 2019.
All research outputs
#15,050,105
of 23,154,520 outputs
Outputs from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#10,703
of 12,383 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#202,600
of 346,862 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#149
of 175 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,154,520 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 32nd percentile – i.e., 32% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 12,383 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 32.5. This one is in the 12th percentile – i.e., 12% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 346,862 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 38th percentile – i.e., 38% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 175 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 11th percentile – i.e., 11% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.