↓ Skip to main content

Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews

Interventions for age-related visual problems in patients with stroke

Overview of attention for article published in Cochrane database of systematic reviews, March 2012
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (73rd percentile)
  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source

Mentioned by

policy
1 policy source
twitter
4 tweeters

Citations

dimensions_citation
15 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
235 Mendeley
Title
Interventions for age-related visual problems in patients with stroke
Published in
Cochrane database of systematic reviews, March 2012
DOI 10.1002/14651858.cd008390.pub2
Pubmed ID
Authors

Alex Pollock, Christine Hazelton, Clair A Henderson, Jayne Angilley, Baljean Dhillon, Peter Langhorne, Katrina Livingstone, Frank A Munro, Heather Orr, Fiona J Rowe, Uma Shahani

Abstract

The prevalence of eye problems increases with age and, consequently, so does the level of visual impairment. As the incidence of stroke also increases with age, a significant proportion of stroke patients will have age-related visual problems. It is possible that the effect of interventions for age-related visual problems may differ in the population of stroke patients compared to the wider population of older people. The interaction between the problems arising directly from stroke and those arising directly from age-related visual problems will be complex. Interventions for age-related visual problems may also be affected by the presence of other stroke-related co-morbidities. Consequently, the nature and outcome of interventions for age-related visual problems may be different in patients with stroke.

Twitter Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 4 tweeters who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 235 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United Kingdom 2 <1%
Malaysia 1 <1%
Unknown 232 99%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 37 16%
Student > Ph. D. Student 35 15%
Student > Bachelor 31 13%
Researcher 29 12%
Other 14 6%
Other 49 21%
Unknown 40 17%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 65 28%
Nursing and Health Professions 34 14%
Psychology 22 9%
Social Sciences 13 6%
Neuroscience 9 4%
Other 38 16%
Unknown 54 23%

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 5. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 08 February 2021.
All research outputs
#4,766,479
of 17,361,274 outputs
Outputs from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#7,213
of 11,660 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#33,999
of 132,068 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#61
of 116 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 17,361,274 research outputs across all sources so far. This one has received more attention than most of these and is in the 72nd percentile.
So far Altmetric has tracked 11,660 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 25.0. This one is in the 37th percentile – i.e., 37% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 132,068 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 73% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 116 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 44th percentile – i.e., 44% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.