↓ Skip to main content

Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews

Oxygen therapy for pneumonia in adults

Overview of attention for article published in Cochrane database of systematic reviews, March 2012
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (94th percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (80th percentile)

Mentioned by

policy
1 policy source
twitter
23 X users
facebook
1 Facebook page
wikipedia
16 Wikipedia pages
q&a
1 Q&A thread

Citations

dimensions_citation
18 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
282 Mendeley
citeulike
1 CiteULike
Title
Oxygen therapy for pneumonia in adults
Published in
Cochrane database of systematic reviews, March 2012
DOI 10.1002/14651858.cd006607.pub4
Pubmed ID
Authors

Yanling Zhang, Chenli Fang, Bi Rong Dong, Taixiang Wu, Jue Lin Deng

Abstract

Oxygen therapy is widely used in the treatment of lung diseases. However, the effectiveness of oxygen therapy as a treatment for pneumonia is not well known.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 23 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 282 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Portugal 1 <1%
Indonesia 1 <1%
Chile 1 <1%
France 1 <1%
Italy 1 <1%
South Africa 1 <1%
Japan 1 <1%
Unknown 275 98%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Bachelor 47 17%
Student > Master 40 14%
Researcher 25 9%
Other 16 6%
Student > Doctoral Student 15 5%
Other 59 21%
Unknown 80 28%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 123 44%
Nursing and Health Professions 34 12%
Psychology 7 2%
Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science 7 2%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 6 2%
Other 21 7%
Unknown 84 30%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 24. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 12 December 2022.
All research outputs
#1,610,499
of 25,457,858 outputs
Outputs from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#3,447
of 11,499 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#8,623
of 169,202 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#35
of 180 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,457,858 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 93rd percentile: it's in the top 10% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 11,499 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 40.0. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 72% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 169,202 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 94% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 180 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 80% of its contemporaries.