↓ Skip to main content

Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews

Oxygen therapy for pneumonia in adults

Overview of attention for article published in Cochrane database of systematic reviews, March 2012
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (94th percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (91st percentile)

Mentioned by

twitter
24 tweeters
facebook
1 Facebook page
wikipedia
2 Wikipedia pages
q&a
1 Q&A thread

Citations

dimensions_citation
13 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
203 Mendeley
citeulike
1 CiteULike
Title
Oxygen therapy for pneumonia in adults
Published in
Cochrane database of systematic reviews, March 2012
DOI 10.1002/14651858.cd006607.pub4
Pubmed ID
Authors

Yanling Zhang, Chenli Fang, Bi Rong Dong, Taixiang Wu, Jue Lin Deng

Abstract

Oxygen therapy is widely used in the treatment of lung diseases. However, the effectiveness of oxygen therapy as a treatment for pneumonia is not well known.

Twitter Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 24 tweeters who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 203 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Portugal 1 <1%
Indonesia 1 <1%
Chile 1 <1%
France 1 <1%
Italy 1 <1%
South Africa 1 <1%
Japan 1 <1%
Unknown 196 97%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 36 18%
Student > Bachelor 35 17%
Researcher 21 10%
Student > Postgraduate 14 7%
Student > Doctoral Student 13 6%
Other 49 24%
Unknown 35 17%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 110 54%
Nursing and Health Professions 30 15%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 6 3%
Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science 5 2%
Psychology 4 2%
Other 12 6%
Unknown 36 18%

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 22. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 30 November 2020.
All research outputs
#1,110,360
of 17,979,785 outputs
Outputs from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#2,833
of 11,801 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#7,013
of 134,128 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#11
of 116 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 17,979,785 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 93rd percentile: it's in the top 10% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 11,801 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 25.4. This one has done well, scoring higher than 75% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 134,128 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 94% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 116 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 91% of its contemporaries.