The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 3 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
As of 1 July 2024, you may notice a temporary increase in the numbers of X profiles with Unknown location. Click here to learn more.
| Title |
Memory Rehabilitation for people with multiple sclerosis
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Cochrane database of systematic reviews, March 2012
|
| DOI | 10.1002/14651858.cd008754.pub2 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
das Nair R, Ferguson H, Stark DL, Lincoln NB, das Nair, Roshan, Ferguson, Heather, Stark, Daniel L, Lincoln, Nadina B |
| Abstract |
Impairments in cognitive function, particularly memory, are common in patients with Multiple Sclerosis (MS) and these can potentially affect their ability to complete functional activities. There is evidence from single-case or small group studies that memory rehabilitation can be beneficial for patients with MS but findings from randomised controlled trials (RCTs) and systematic reviews have been inconclusive. |
X Demographics
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United States | 1 | 33% |
| Unknown | 2 | 67% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 3 | 100% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 169 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Spain | 3 | 2% |
| United Kingdom | 3 | 2% |
| Iran, Islamic Republic of | 1 | <1% |
| Unknown | 162 | 96% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Researcher | 28 | 17% |
| Student > Master | 23 | 14% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 21 | 12% |
| Student > Bachelor | 20 | 12% |
| Student > Doctoral Student | 16 | 9% |
| Other | 35 | 21% |
| Unknown | 26 | 15% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Psychology | 46 | 27% |
| Medicine and Dentistry | 37 | 22% |
| Neuroscience | 14 | 8% |
| Nursing and Health Professions | 12 | 7% |
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 6 | 4% |
| Other | 16 | 9% |
| Unknown | 38 | 22% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 2. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 19 March 2012.
All research outputs
#14,725,323
of 22,663,969 outputs
Outputs from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#10,606
of 12,296 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#97,263
of 156,709 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#153
of 182 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,663,969 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 32nd percentile – i.e., 32% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 12,296 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 30.3. This one is in the 12th percentile – i.e., 12% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 156,709 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 36th percentile – i.e., 36% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 182 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 14th percentile – i.e., 14% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.