| Title |
Follow-up for improving psychological well being for women after a miscarriage
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Cochrane database of systematic reviews, March 2012
|
| DOI | 10.1002/14651858.cd008679.pub2 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Fiona A Murphy, Allyson Lipp, Diane L Powles |
| Abstract |
Miscarriage is the premature expulsion of an embryo or fetus from the uterus up to 23 weeks of pregnancy and weighing up to 500 grams. International studies using diagnostic tools have identified that some women suffer from anxiety, depression and grief after miscarriage. Psychological follow-up might detect those women who are at risk of psychological complications following miscarriage. This review is necessary as the evidence is equivocal on the benefits of psychological follow-up after miscarriage. |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 4 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Ireland | 1 | 25% |
| United States | 1 | 25% |
| Unknown | 2 | 50% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 3 | 75% |
| Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 1 | 25% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 314 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| France | 1 | <1% |
| Italy | 1 | <1% |
| India | 1 | <1% |
| Spain | 1 | <1% |
| United States | 1 | <1% |
| Unknown | 309 | 98% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Master | 57 | 18% |
| Student > Bachelor | 44 | 14% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 36 | 11% |
| Researcher | 28 | 9% |
| Student > Postgraduate | 18 | 6% |
| Other | 58 | 18% |
| Unknown | 73 | 23% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Medicine and Dentistry | 92 | 29% |
| Psychology | 55 | 18% |
| Nursing and Health Professions | 40 | 13% |
| Social Sciences | 18 | 6% |
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 7 | 2% |
| Other | 24 | 8% |
| Unknown | 78 | 25% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 11. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 06 April 2020.
All research outputs
#2,798,409
of 22,663,969 outputs
Outputs from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#5,476
of 12,296 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#17,896
of 156,709 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#73
of 182 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,663,969 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 87th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 12,296 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 30.3. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 55% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 156,709 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 88% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 182 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 59% of its contemporaries.