↓ Skip to main content

Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews

Workload and surgeon´s specialty for outcome after colorectal cancer surgery

Overview of attention for article published in Cochrane database of systematic reviews, March 2012
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (73rd percentile)
  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source

Mentioned by

policy
1 policy source
twitter
2 tweeters
facebook
2 Facebook pages

Citations

dimensions_citation
248 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
234 Mendeley
Title
Workload and surgeon´s specialty for outcome after colorectal cancer surgery
Published in
Cochrane database of systematic reviews, March 2012
DOI 10.1002/14651858.cd005391.pub3
Pubmed ID
Authors

David Archampong, David Borowski, Peer Wille-Jørgensen, Lene H Iversen

Abstract

A large body of research has focused on investigating the effects of healthcare provider volume and specialization on patient outcomes including outcomes of colorectal cancer surgery. However there is conflicting evidence about the role of such healthcare provider characteristics in the management of colorectal cancer.

Twitter Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 2 tweeters who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 234 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Switzerland 1 <1%
France 1 <1%
Italy 1 <1%
United Kingdom 1 <1%
Slovakia 1 <1%
Denmark 1 <1%
United States 1 <1%
Unknown 227 97%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 44 19%
Student > Master 32 14%
Student > Ph. D. Student 28 12%
Other 23 10%
Student > Postgraduate 17 7%
Other 46 20%
Unknown 44 19%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 126 54%
Nursing and Health Professions 16 7%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 7 3%
Business, Management and Accounting 4 2%
Psychology 4 2%
Other 19 8%
Unknown 58 25%

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 5. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 01 July 2020.
All research outputs
#4,906,366
of 18,068,324 outputs
Outputs from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#7,205
of 11,814 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#34,085
of 134,230 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#60
of 116 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 18,068,324 research outputs across all sources so far. This one has received more attention than most of these and is in the 72nd percentile.
So far Altmetric has tracked 11,814 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 25.5. This one is in the 38th percentile – i.e., 38% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 134,230 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 73% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 116 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 46th percentile – i.e., 46% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.