| Title |
Acupuncture for chronic hepatitis B
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Cochrane database of systematic reviews, August 2019
|
| DOI | 10.1002/14651858.cd013107.pub2 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
De Zhao Kong, Ning Liang, Guan Lin Yang, Zhe Zhang, Yue Liu, Ye Yang, Yu Xi Liu, Qi Ge Wang, Fan Zhang, Hui Yong Zhang, Dimitrinka Nikolova, Janus C Jakobsen, Christian Gluud, Jian Ping Liu |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 7 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| South Africa | 2 | 29% |
| France | 1 | 14% |
| Spain | 1 | 14% |
| Unknown | 3 | 43% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 6 | 86% |
| Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 1 | 14% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 237 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 237 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Master | 34 | 14% |
| Student > Bachelor | 22 | 9% |
| Researcher | 17 | 7% |
| Other | 15 | 6% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 10 | 4% |
| Other | 26 | 11% |
| Unknown | 113 | 48% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Medicine and Dentistry | 49 | 21% |
| Nursing and Health Professions | 25 | 11% |
| Social Sciences | 6 | 3% |
| Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science | 5 | 2% |
| Economics, Econometrics and Finance | 4 | 2% |
| Other | 24 | 10% |
| Unknown | 124 | 52% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 6. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 29 November 2023.
All research outputs
#6,401,978
of 25,462,162 outputs
Outputs from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#7,900
of 12,090 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#104,521
of 352,125 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#100
of 128 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,462,162 research outputs across all sources so far. This one has received more attention than most of these and is in the 74th percentile.
So far Altmetric has tracked 12,090 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 38.2. This one is in the 37th percentile – i.e., 37% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 352,125 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 70% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 128 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 21st percentile – i.e., 21% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.