↓ Skip to main content

Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews

Balneotherapy for chronic venous insufficiency

Overview of attention for article published in Cochrane database of systematic reviews, August 2019
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (89th percentile)
  • Above-average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (61st percentile)

Mentioned by

news
1 news outlet
twitter
8 X users
facebook
1 Facebook page
wikipedia
1 Wikipedia page

Citations

dimensions_citation
20 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
169 Mendeley
Title
Balneotherapy for chronic venous insufficiency
Published in
Cochrane database of systematic reviews, August 2019
DOI 10.1002/14651858.cd013085.pub2
Pubmed ID
Authors

Melissa Andreia de Moraes Silva, Luis CU Nakano, Lígia L Cisneros, Fausto Miranda

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 8 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 169 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 169 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Bachelor 25 15%
Student > Master 24 14%
Researcher 16 9%
Student > Postgraduate 13 8%
Other 10 6%
Other 22 13%
Unknown 59 35%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 49 29%
Nursing and Health Professions 30 18%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 4 2%
Immunology and Microbiology 3 2%
Neuroscience 3 2%
Other 16 9%
Unknown 64 38%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 17. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 15 May 2022.
All research outputs
#2,086,256
of 25,378,284 outputs
Outputs from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#4,412
of 12,041 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#39,394
of 321,439 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#63
of 165 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,378,284 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 91st percentile: it's in the top 10% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 12,041 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 38.4. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 63% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 321,439 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 89% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 165 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 61% of its contemporaries.