| Title |
Hysterectomy with opportunistic salpingectomy versus hysterectomy alone
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Cochrane database of systematic reviews, August 2019
|
| DOI | 10.1002/14651858.cd012858.pub2 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Laura A M van Lieshout, Miranda P Steenbeek, Joanne A De Hullu, M Caroline Vos, Saskia Houterman, Jack Wilkinson, Jurgen MJ Piek |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 17 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Japan | 4 | 24% |
| Colombia | 1 | 6% |
| United Kingdom | 1 | 6% |
| Unknown | 11 | 65% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 16 | 94% |
| Scientists | 1 | 6% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 147 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 147 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Bachelor | 20 | 14% |
| Student > Master | 14 | 10% |
| Other | 13 | 9% |
| Researcher | 9 | 6% |
| Student > Doctoral Student | 9 | 6% |
| Other | 21 | 14% |
| Unknown | 61 | 41% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Medicine and Dentistry | 43 | 29% |
| Nursing and Health Professions | 13 | 9% |
| Psychology | 6 | 4% |
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 3 | 2% |
| Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology | 2 | 1% |
| Other | 10 | 7% |
| Unknown | 70 | 48% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 20. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 23 October 2023.
All research outputs
#1,923,541
of 25,837,817 outputs
Outputs from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#4,109
of 13,168 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#38,905
of 352,514 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#60
of 172 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,837,817 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 92nd percentile: it's in the top 10% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 13,168 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 35.9. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 68% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 352,514 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 88% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 172 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 65% of its contemporaries.