↓ Skip to main content

Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews

Hysterectomy with opportunistic salpingectomy versus hysterectomy alone

Overview of attention for article published in Cochrane database of systematic reviews, August 2019
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (78th percentile)
  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source

Mentioned by

twitter
15 tweeters
facebook
1 Facebook page

Citations

dimensions_citation
12 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
66 Mendeley
Title
Hysterectomy with opportunistic salpingectomy versus hysterectomy alone
Published in
Cochrane database of systematic reviews, August 2019
DOI 10.1002/14651858.cd012858.pub2
Pubmed ID
Authors

Laura A M van Lieshout, Miranda P Steenbeek, Joanne A De Hullu, M Caroline Vos, Saskia Houterman, Jack Wilkinson, Jurgen MJ Piek

Twitter Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 15 tweeters who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 66 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 66 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Bachelor 12 18%
Student > Master 7 11%
Student > Doctoral Student 6 9%
Student > Postgraduate 6 9%
Researcher 6 9%
Other 13 20%
Unknown 16 24%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 21 32%
Nursing and Health Professions 10 15%
Psychology 6 9%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 2 3%
Arts and Humanities 1 2%
Other 6 9%
Unknown 20 30%

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 9. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 09 February 2021.
All research outputs
#2,697,601
of 17,687,978 outputs
Outputs from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#5,239
of 11,732 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#56,463
of 269,507 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#26
of 40 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 17,687,978 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 84th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 11,732 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 25.3. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 55% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 269,507 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 78% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 40 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 37th percentile – i.e., 37% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.