↓ Skip to main content

Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews

Interventions for morphea

Overview of attention for article published in Cochrane database of systematic reviews, July 2019
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (78th percentile)
  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source

Mentioned by

policy
1 policy source
twitter
6 tweeters
facebook
1 Facebook page
wikipedia
2 Wikipedia pages

Citations

dimensions_citation
14 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
260 Mendeley
Title
Interventions for morphea
Published in
Cochrane database of systematic reviews, July 2019
DOI 10.1002/14651858.cd005027.pub5
Pubmed ID
Authors

Julia V de Albuquerque, Brenda NG Andriolo, Monica RA Vasconcellos, Vinicius T Civile, Anne Lyddiatt, Virginia FM Trevisani

Twitter Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 6 tweeters who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 260 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United States 1 <1%
Unknown 259 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Bachelor 37 14%
Student > Master 35 13%
Student > Postgraduate 19 7%
Researcher 18 7%
Student > Doctoral Student 17 7%
Other 50 19%
Unknown 84 32%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 91 35%
Nursing and Health Professions 30 12%
Psychology 6 2%
Social Sciences 6 2%
Sports and Recreations 6 2%
Other 27 10%
Unknown 94 36%

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 9. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 01 February 2022.
All research outputs
#3,353,285
of 21,689,971 outputs
Outputs from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#5,851
of 12,103 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#61,485
of 285,265 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#27
of 42 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 21,689,971 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 84th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 12,103 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 29.5. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 51% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 285,265 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 78% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 42 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 38th percentile – i.e., 38% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.