↓ Skip to main content

Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews

Interventions for morphea

Overview of attention for article published in Cochrane database of systematic reviews, July 2019
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (76th percentile)
  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source

Mentioned by

policy
1 policy source
twitter
3 tweeters
wikipedia
1 Wikipedia page

Citations

dimensions_citation
6 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
194 Mendeley
Title
Interventions for morphea
Published in
Cochrane database of systematic reviews, July 2019
DOI 10.1002/14651858.cd005027.pub5
Pubmed ID
Authors

Julia V de Albuquerque, Brenda NG Andriolo, Monica RA Vasconcellos, Vinicius T Civile, Anne Lyddiatt, Virginia FM Trevisani

Twitter Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 3 tweeters who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 194 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United States 1 <1%
Unknown 193 99%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 29 15%
Student > Bachelor 22 11%
Student > Postgraduate 18 9%
Researcher 16 8%
Student > Doctoral Student 15 8%
Other 45 23%
Unknown 49 25%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 75 39%
Nursing and Health Professions 28 14%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 7 4%
Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science 5 3%
Social Sciences 4 2%
Other 23 12%
Unknown 52 27%

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 8. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 15 April 2020.
All research outputs
#2,911,648
of 17,444,955 outputs
Outputs from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#5,549
of 11,692 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#62,510
of 270,033 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#24
of 40 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 17,444,955 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 83rd percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 11,692 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 25.1. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 52% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 270,033 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 76% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 40 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 42nd percentile – i.e., 42% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.