↓ Skip to main content

Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews

Interventions for unexplained infertility: a systematic review and network meta-analysis

Overview of attention for article published in Cochrane database of systematic reviews, September 2019
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (89th percentile)
  • Above-average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (62nd percentile)

Mentioned by

news
1 news outlet
twitter
20 tweeters

Citations

dimensions_citation
21 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
98 Mendeley
Title
Interventions for unexplained infertility: a systematic review and network meta-analysis
Published in
Cochrane database of systematic reviews, September 2019
DOI 10.1002/14651858.cd012692.pub2
Pubmed ID
Authors

Rui Wang, Nora A Danhof, Raissa I Tjon-Kon-Fat, Marinus JC Eijkemans, Patrick MM Bossuyt, Monique H Mochtar, Fulco van der Veen, Siladitya Bhattacharya, Ben Willem J Mol, Madelon van Wely

Twitter Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 20 tweeters who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 98 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 98 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Bachelor 17 17%
Researcher 11 11%
Student > Master 11 11%
Student > Ph. D. Student 8 8%
Student > Postgraduate 5 5%
Other 16 16%
Unknown 30 31%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 24 24%
Nursing and Health Professions 12 12%
Social Sciences 5 5%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 4 4%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 3 3%
Other 12 12%
Unknown 38 39%

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 20. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 23 December 2019.
All research outputs
#1,090,159
of 16,504,752 outputs
Outputs from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#2,941
of 11,518 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#28,469
of 267,710 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#15
of 40 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 16,504,752 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 93rd percentile: it's in the top 10% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 11,518 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 24.4. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 74% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 267,710 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 89% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 40 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 62% of its contemporaries.