↓ Skip to main content

Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews

Interventions for unexplained infertility: a systematic review and network meta-analysis

Overview of attention for article published in Cochrane database of systematic reviews, September 2019
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (89th percentile)
  • Above-average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (54th percentile)

Mentioned by

news
1 news outlet
twitter
21 tweeters

Citations

dimensions_citation
37 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
135 Mendeley
Title
Interventions for unexplained infertility: a systematic review and network meta-analysis
Published in
Cochrane database of systematic reviews, September 2019
DOI 10.1002/14651858.cd012692.pub2
Pubmed ID
Authors

Rui Wang, Nora A Danhof, Raissa I Tjon-Kon-Fat, Marinus JC Eijkemans, Patrick MM Bossuyt, Monique H Mochtar, Fulco van der Veen, Siladitya Bhattacharya, Ben Willem J Mol, Madelon van Wely

Twitter Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 21 tweeters who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 135 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 135 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Bachelor 20 15%
Student > Master 14 10%
Researcher 13 10%
Student > Ph. D. Student 10 7%
Other 8 6%
Other 22 16%
Unknown 48 36%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 34 25%
Nursing and Health Professions 13 10%
Social Sciences 5 4%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 4 3%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 3 2%
Other 18 13%
Unknown 58 43%

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 21. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 23 December 2019.
All research outputs
#1,492,135
of 22,526,255 outputs
Outputs from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#3,447
of 12,274 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#30,200
of 287,863 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#20
of 42 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,526,255 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 93rd percentile: it's in the top 10% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 12,274 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 30.2. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 71% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 287,863 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 89% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 42 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 54% of its contemporaries.