↓ Skip to main content

Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews

Interventions for unexplained infertility: a systematic review and network meta-analysis

Overview of attention for article published in Cochrane database of systematic reviews, September 2019
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (89th percentile)
  • Above-average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (58th percentile)

Mentioned by

news
1 news outlet
twitter
21 tweeters

Citations

dimensions_citation
34 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
136 Mendeley
Title
Interventions for unexplained infertility: a systematic review and network meta-analysis
Published in
Cochrane database of systematic reviews, September 2019
DOI 10.1002/14651858.cd012692.pub2
Pubmed ID
Authors

Rui Wang, Nora A Danhof, Raissa I Tjon-Kon-Fat, Marinus JC Eijkemans, Patrick MM Bossuyt, Monique H Mochtar, Fulco van der Veen, Siladitya Bhattacharya, Ben Willem J Mol, Madelon van Wely

Twitter Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 21 tweeters who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 136 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 136 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Bachelor 19 14%
Student > Master 16 12%
Researcher 12 9%
Student > Ph. D. Student 10 7%
Other 8 6%
Other 26 19%
Unknown 45 33%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 32 24%
Nursing and Health Professions 15 11%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 5 4%
Business, Management and Accounting 5 4%
Social Sciences 5 4%
Other 18 13%
Unknown 56 41%

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 21. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 23 December 2019.
All research outputs
#1,379,002
of 20,793,985 outputs
Outputs from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#3,314
of 12,111 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#30,052
of 283,468 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#18
of 41 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 20,793,985 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 93rd percentile: it's in the top 10% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 12,111 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 28.4. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 72% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 283,468 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 89% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 41 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 58% of its contemporaries.