↓ Skip to main content

Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews

Interventions for unexplained infertility: a systematic review and network meta-analysis

Overview of attention for article published in Cochrane database of systematic reviews, September 2019
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (91st percentile)
  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (79th percentile)

Mentioned by

news
2 news outlets
twitter
21 X users

Citations

dimensions_citation
53 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
179 Mendeley
Title
Interventions for unexplained infertility: a systematic review and network meta-analysis
Published in
Cochrane database of systematic reviews, September 2019
DOI 10.1002/14651858.cd012692.pub2
Pubmed ID
Authors

Rui Wang, Nora A Danhof, Raissa I Tjon-Kon-Fat, Marinus JC Eijkemans, Patrick MM Bossuyt, Monique H Mochtar, Fulco van der Veen, Siladitya Bhattacharya, Ben Willem J Mol, Madelon van Wely

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 21 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 179 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 179 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Bachelor 27 15%
Student > Master 18 10%
Researcher 14 8%
Other 13 7%
Student > Ph. D. Student 13 7%
Other 27 15%
Unknown 67 37%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 45 25%
Nursing and Health Professions 15 8%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 7 4%
Social Sciences 5 3%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 5 3%
Other 24 13%
Unknown 78 44%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 28. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 24 December 2022.
All research outputs
#1,359,734
of 25,051,161 outputs
Outputs from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#2,954
of 13,015 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#28,387
of 346,695 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#37
of 173 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,051,161 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 94th percentile: it's in the top 10% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 13,015 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 35.2. This one has done well, scoring higher than 77% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 346,695 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 91% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 173 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 79% of its contemporaries.