The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 17 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
As of 1 July 2024, you may notice a temporary increase in the numbers of X profiles with Unknown location. Click here to learn more.
| Title |
Follow‐up strategies for patients treated for non‐metastatic colorectal cancer
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Cochrane database of systematic reviews, September 2019
|
| DOI | 10.1002/14651858.cd002200.pub4 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Mark Jeffery, Brigid E Hickey, Phillip N Hider |
X Demographics
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United States | 2 | 12% |
| United Kingdom | 2 | 12% |
| Unknown | 13 | 76% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 14 | 82% |
| Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 2 | 12% |
| Scientists | 1 | 6% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 349 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Canada | 2 | <1% |
| United Kingdom | 1 | <1% |
| India | 1 | <1% |
| United States | 1 | <1% |
| Unknown | 344 | 99% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Researcher | 36 | 10% |
| Student > Bachelor | 33 | 9% |
| Other | 31 | 9% |
| Student > Master | 29 | 8% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 28 | 8% |
| Other | 73 | 21% |
| Unknown | 119 | 34% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Medicine and Dentistry | 117 | 34% |
| Nursing and Health Professions | 35 | 10% |
| Psychology | 10 | 3% |
| Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology | 9 | 3% |
| Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science | 9 | 3% |
| Other | 38 | 11% |
| Unknown | 131 | 38% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 21. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 02 October 2023.
All research outputs
#1,888,143
of 26,375,498 outputs
Outputs from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#3,847
of 13,210 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#37,376
of 353,804 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#49
of 174 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 26,375,498 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 92nd percentile: it's in the top 10% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 13,210 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 35.6. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 70% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 353,804 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 89% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 174 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 71% of its contemporaries.