↓ Skip to main content

Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews

Follow-up strategies for patients treated for non-metastatic colorectal cancer

Overview of attention for article published in Cochrane database of systematic reviews, September 2019
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (91st percentile)
  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (78th percentile)

Mentioned by

blogs
1 blog
twitter
29 tweeters
facebook
3 Facebook pages
wikipedia
1 Wikipedia page

Citations

dimensions_citation
67 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
304 Mendeley
Title
Follow-up strategies for patients treated for non-metastatic colorectal cancer
Published in
Cochrane database of systematic reviews, September 2019
DOI 10.1002/14651858.cd002200.pub4
Pubmed ID
Authors

Mark Jeffery, Brigid E Hickey, Phillip N Hider

Twitter Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 29 tweeters who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 304 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Canada 2 <1%
United Kingdom 1 <1%
India 1 <1%
United States 1 <1%
Unknown 299 98%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 37 12%
Student > Master 28 9%
Student > Bachelor 28 9%
Other 26 9%
Student > Ph. D. Student 25 8%
Other 70 23%
Unknown 90 30%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 106 35%
Nursing and Health Professions 35 12%
Psychology 10 3%
Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science 9 3%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 8 3%
Other 35 12%
Unknown 101 33%

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 27. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 22 September 2021.
All research outputs
#1,249,392
of 23,155,957 outputs
Outputs from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#2,864
of 12,383 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#28,204
of 340,614 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#37
of 173 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,155,957 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 94th percentile: it's in the top 10% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 12,383 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 32.5. This one has done well, scoring higher than 76% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 340,614 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 91% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 173 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 78% of its contemporaries.