↓ Skip to main content

Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews

Mini-Cog for the diagnosis of Alzheimer’s disease dementia and other dementias within a secondary care setting

Overview of attention for article published in Cochrane database of systematic reviews, September 2019
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 5% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (92nd percentile)
  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (72nd percentile)

Mentioned by

news
1 news outlet
twitter
38 tweeters
facebook
1 Facebook page

Citations

dimensions_citation
11 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
147 Mendeley
Title
Mini-Cog for the diagnosis of Alzheimer’s disease dementia and other dementias within a secondary care setting
Published in
Cochrane database of systematic reviews, September 2019
DOI 10.1002/14651858.cd011414.pub2
Pubmed ID
Authors

Calvin CH Chan, Bruce A Fage, Jennifer K Burton, Nadja Smailagic, Sudeep S Gill, Nathan Herrmann, Vasilis Nikolaou, Terry J Quinn, Anna H Noel-Storr, Dallas P Seitz

Twitter Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 38 tweeters who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 147 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 147 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Bachelor 26 18%
Student > Master 17 12%
Researcher 15 10%
Student > Postgraduate 9 6%
Student > Ph. D. Student 9 6%
Other 20 14%
Unknown 51 35%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 32 22%
Nursing and Health Professions 15 10%
Psychology 10 7%
Neuroscience 9 6%
Social Sciences 6 4%
Other 18 12%
Unknown 57 39%

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 32. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 19 February 2021.
All research outputs
#835,495
of 18,687,462 outputs
Outputs from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#2,061
of 11,844 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#17,508
of 229,513 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#10
of 33 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 18,687,462 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 95th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 11,844 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 26.3. This one has done well, scoring higher than 82% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 229,513 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 92% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 33 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 72% of its contemporaries.