↓ Skip to main content

Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews

Biopsy versus resection for high‐grade glioma

Overview of attention for article published in Cochrane database of systematic reviews, June 2019
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Above-average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (64th percentile)

Mentioned by

twitter
1 X user
facebook
2 Facebook pages
wikipedia
1 Wikipedia page

Citations

dimensions_citation
11 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
168 Mendeley
Title
Biopsy versus resection for high‐grade glioma
Published in
Cochrane database of systematic reviews, June 2019
DOI 10.1002/14651858.cd002034.pub2
Pubmed ID
Authors

Michael G Hart, Gareth RL Grant, Emma F Solyom, Robin Grant

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 X user who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 168 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 168 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Bachelor 21 13%
Student > Master 18 11%
Researcher 15 9%
Student > Ph. D. Student 13 8%
Other 11 7%
Other 32 19%
Unknown 58 35%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 55 33%
Nursing and Health Professions 12 7%
Unspecified 7 4%
Social Sciences 6 4%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 5 3%
Other 17 10%
Unknown 66 39%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 4. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 16 December 2019.
All research outputs
#7,360,834
of 25,385,509 outputs
Outputs from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#8,389
of 11,485 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#127,610
of 366,914 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#120
of 142 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,385,509 research outputs across all sources so far. This one has received more attention than most of these and is in the 69th percentile.
So far Altmetric has tracked 11,485 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 39.9. This one is in the 25th percentile – i.e., 25% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 366,914 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 64% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 142 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 14th percentile – i.e., 14% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.