↓ Skip to main content

Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews

Conservative interventions for treating functional daytime urinary incontinence in children

Overview of attention for article published in Cochrane database of systematic reviews, September 2019
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 5% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (91st percentile)
  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (66th percentile)

Mentioned by

news
1 news outlet
twitter
26 tweeters
facebook
1 Facebook page
wikipedia
1 Wikipedia page

Citations

dimensions_citation
7 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
115 Mendeley
Title
Conservative interventions for treating functional daytime urinary incontinence in children
Published in
Cochrane database of systematic reviews, September 2019
DOI 10.1002/14651858.cd012367.pub2
Pubmed ID
Authors

Brian S Buckley, Caroline D Sanders, Loukia Spineli, Qiaoling Deng, Joey SW Kwong

Twitter Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 26 tweeters who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 115 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 115 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 15 13%
Researcher 13 11%
Student > Bachelor 10 9%
Student > Ph. D. Student 9 8%
Other 7 6%
Other 20 17%
Unknown 41 36%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 23 20%
Nursing and Health Professions 11 10%
Psychology 9 8%
Social Sciences 8 7%
Sports and Recreations 5 4%
Other 16 14%
Unknown 43 37%

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 29. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 07 May 2020.
All research outputs
#863,656
of 17,658,188 outputs
Outputs from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#2,231
of 11,729 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#22,269
of 275,719 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#12
of 33 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 17,658,188 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 95th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 11,729 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 25.3. This one has done well, scoring higher than 80% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 275,719 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 91% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 33 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 66% of its contemporaries.