↓ Skip to main content

Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews

Conservative interventions for treating functional daytime urinary incontinence in children

Overview of attention for article published in Cochrane database of systematic reviews, September 2019
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (87th percentile)
  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (66th percentile)

Mentioned by

news
1 news outlet
twitter
9 X users
facebook
1 Facebook page
wikipedia
1 Wikipedia page

Citations

dimensions_citation
14 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
367 Mendeley
Title
Conservative interventions for treating functional daytime urinary incontinence in children
Published in
Cochrane database of systematic reviews, September 2019
DOI 10.1002/14651858.cd012367.pub2
Pubmed ID
Authors

Brian S Buckley, Caroline D Sanders, Loukia Spineli, Qiaoling Deng, Joey SW Kwong

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 9 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 367 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 367 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 53 14%
Student > Bachelor 32 9%
Researcher 30 8%
Student > Ph. D. Student 25 7%
Other 20 5%
Other 70 19%
Unknown 137 37%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 68 19%
Nursing and Health Professions 55 15%
Psychology 16 4%
Social Sciences 13 4%
Sports and Recreations 10 3%
Other 51 14%
Unknown 154 42%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 18. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 12 November 2019.
All research outputs
#2,150,030
of 26,163,973 outputs
Outputs from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#4,378
of 13,188 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#42,922
of 356,503 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#61
of 181 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 26,163,973 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 91st percentile: it's in the top 10% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 13,188 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 35.5. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 66% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 356,503 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 87% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 181 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 66% of its contemporaries.