↓ Skip to main content

Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews

Antibiotic treatment for spontaneous bacterial peritonitis in people with decompensated liver cirrhosis: a network meta-analysis

Overview of attention for article published in Cochrane database of systematic reviews, September 2019
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (65th percentile)

Mentioned by

twitter
7 tweeters
facebook
1 Facebook page

Citations

dimensions_citation
6 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
77 Mendeley
Title
Antibiotic treatment for spontaneous bacterial peritonitis in people with decompensated liver cirrhosis: a network meta-analysis
Published in
Cochrane database of systematic reviews, September 2019
DOI 10.1002/14651858.cd013120.pub2
Pubmed ID
Authors

Laura Iogna Prat, Peter Wilson, Suzanne C Freeman, Alex J Sutton, Nicola J Cooper, Davide Roccarina, Amine Benmassaoud, Maria Corina Plaz Torres, Neil Hawkins, Maxine Cowlin, Elisabeth Jane Milne, Douglas Thorburn, Chavdar S Pavlov, Brian R Davidson, Emmanuel Tsochatzis, Kurinchi Selvan Gurusamy

Twitter Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 7 tweeters who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 77 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 77 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 10 13%
Student > Bachelor 9 12%
Researcher 7 9%
Student > Postgraduate 6 8%
Other 6 8%
Other 12 16%
Unknown 27 35%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 26 34%
Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science 4 5%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 4 5%
Nursing and Health Professions 4 5%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 1 1%
Other 7 9%
Unknown 31 40%

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 5. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 30 November 2020.
All research outputs
#5,096,711
of 18,585,396 outputs
Outputs from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#7,421
of 11,834 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#95,380
of 279,773 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#23
of 30 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 18,585,396 research outputs across all sources so far. This one has received more attention than most of these and is in the 72nd percentile.
So far Altmetric has tracked 11,834 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 26.1. This one is in the 37th percentile – i.e., 37% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 279,773 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 65% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 30 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 26th percentile – i.e., 26% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.