↓ Skip to main content

Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews

Antibiotic treatment for spontaneous bacterial peritonitis in people with decompensated liver cirrhosis: a network meta-analysis

Overview of attention for article published in Cochrane database of systematic reviews, September 2019
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (65th percentile)

Mentioned by

twitter
7 tweeters
facebook
1 Facebook page

Citations

dimensions_citation
8 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
104 Mendeley
Title
Antibiotic treatment for spontaneous bacterial peritonitis in people with decompensated liver cirrhosis: a network meta-analysis
Published in
Cochrane database of systematic reviews, September 2019
DOI 10.1002/14651858.cd013120.pub2
Pubmed ID
Authors

Laura Iogna Prat, Peter Wilson, Suzanne C Freeman, Alex J Sutton, Nicola J Cooper, Davide Roccarina, Amine Benmassaoud, Maria Corina Plaz Torres, Neil Hawkins, Maxine Cowlin, Elisabeth Jane Milne, Douglas Thorburn, Chavdar S Pavlov, Brian R Davidson, Emmanuel Tsochatzis, Kurinchi Selvan Gurusamy

Twitter Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 7 tweeters who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 104 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 104 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Bachelor 13 13%
Student > Master 11 11%
Student > Postgraduate 7 7%
Other 7 7%
Researcher 7 7%
Other 14 13%
Unknown 45 43%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 31 30%
Nursing and Health Professions 5 5%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 4 4%
Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science 4 4%
Immunology and Microbiology 1 <1%
Other 10 10%
Unknown 49 47%

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 5. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 30 November 2020.
All research outputs
#6,188,933
of 22,514,001 outputs
Outputs from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#8,035
of 12,268 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#82,720
of 241,253 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#29
of 36 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,514,001 research outputs across all sources so far. This one has received more attention than most of these and is in the 72nd percentile.
So far Altmetric has tracked 12,268 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 30.1. This one is in the 34th percentile – i.e., 34% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 241,253 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 65% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 36 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 22nd percentile – i.e., 22% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.