↓ Skip to main content

Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews

Strategies for increasing the participation of women in community breast cancer screening

Overview of attention for article published in Cochrane database of systematic reviews, January 2001
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (83rd percentile)
  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (72nd percentile)

Mentioned by

twitter
8 tweeters

Citations

dimensions_citation
136 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
209 Mendeley
citeulike
1 CiteULike
Title
Strategies for increasing the participation of women in community breast cancer screening
Published in
Cochrane database of systematic reviews, January 2001
DOI 10.1002/14651858.cd002943
Authors

Xavier Bonfill Cosp, Mercè Marzo Castillejo, Manel Pladevall Vila, Joan Marti, José I Emparanza

Twitter Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 8 tweeters who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 209 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Sri Lanka 1 <1%
Ireland 1 <1%
Canada 1 <1%
Unknown 206 99%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 31 15%
Student > Master 30 14%
Student > Ph. D. Student 27 13%
Student > Bachelor 18 9%
Student > Postgraduate 15 7%
Other 44 21%
Unknown 44 21%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 77 37%
Nursing and Health Professions 18 9%
Social Sciences 14 7%
Psychology 9 4%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 7 3%
Other 24 11%
Unknown 60 29%

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 6. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 19 October 2018.
All research outputs
#5,416,635
of 22,663,969 outputs
Outputs from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#7,256
of 12,296 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#18,951
of 113,089 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#11
of 40 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,663,969 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 76th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 12,296 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 30.3. This one is in the 40th percentile – i.e., 40% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 113,089 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 83% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 40 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 72% of its contemporaries.