↓ Skip to main content

Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews

The effects of interactive training of healthcare providers on the management of life-threatening emergencies in hospital

Overview of attention for article published in Cochrane database of systematic reviews, September 2019
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 5% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (92nd percentile)
  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (78th percentile)

Mentioned by

twitter
54 tweeters
facebook
3 Facebook pages

Citations

dimensions_citation
10 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
179 Mendeley
Title
The effects of interactive training of healthcare providers on the management of life-threatening emergencies in hospital
Published in
Cochrane database of systematic reviews, September 2019
DOI 10.1002/14651858.cd012177.pub2
Pubmed ID
Authors

Abi Merriel, Jo Ficquet, Katie Barnard, Setor K Kunutsor, Jasmeet Soar, Erik Lenguerrand, Deborah M Caldwell, Christy Burden, Cathy Winter, Tim Draycott, Dimitrios Siassakos

Twitter Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 54 tweeters who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 179 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 179 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Bachelor 27 15%
Researcher 27 15%
Student > Master 26 15%
Student > Ph. D. Student 16 9%
Other 14 8%
Other 26 15%
Unknown 43 24%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 48 27%
Nursing and Health Professions 30 17%
Psychology 12 7%
Social Sciences 6 3%
Business, Management and Accounting 4 2%
Other 19 11%
Unknown 60 34%

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 33. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 03 December 2020.
All research outputs
#826,851
of 19,160,114 outputs
Outputs from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#2,004
of 11,933 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#20,280
of 281,946 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#7
of 28 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 19,160,114 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 95th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 11,933 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 27.0. This one has done well, scoring higher than 83% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 281,946 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 92% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 28 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 78% of its contemporaries.