↓ Skip to main content

Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews

Hospital nurse staffing models and patient and staff-related outcomes

Overview of attention for article published in Cochrane database of systematic reviews, July 2011
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (84th percentile)
  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source

Mentioned by

policy
1 policy source
twitter
13 tweeters

Citations

dimensions_citation
116 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
192 Mendeley
citeulike
1 CiteULike
connotea
1 Connotea
Title
Hospital nurse staffing models and patient and staff-related outcomes
Published in
Cochrane database of systematic reviews, July 2011
DOI 10.1002/14651858.cd007019.pub2
Pubmed ID
Authors

Michelle Butler, Rita Collins, Jonathan Drennan, Phil Halligan, Dónal P O'Mathúna, Timothy J Schultz, Ann Sheridan, Eileen Vilis

Twitter Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 13 tweeters who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 192 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Germany 2 1%
Canada 2 1%
United Kingdom 1 <1%
Iran, Islamic Republic of 1 <1%
Spain 1 <1%
United States 1 <1%
Unknown 184 96%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 39 20%
Student > Bachelor 28 15%
Researcher 27 14%
Student > Ph. D. Student 25 13%
Student > Doctoral Student 11 6%
Other 41 21%
Unknown 21 11%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 76 40%
Nursing and Health Professions 40 21%
Social Sciences 16 8%
Psychology 12 6%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 3 2%
Other 12 6%
Unknown 33 17%

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 11. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 01 April 2019.
All research outputs
#2,064,115
of 17,351,915 outputs
Outputs from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#4,742
of 11,661 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#41,529
of 270,634 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#97
of 182 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 17,351,915 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 88th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 11,661 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 25.0. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 59% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 270,634 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 84% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 182 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 47th percentile – i.e., 47% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.