The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 3 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
As of 1 July 2024, you may notice a temporary increase in the numbers of X profiles with Unknown location. Click here to learn more.
| Title |
Behavioral interventions to reduce the transmission of HIV infection among sex workers and their clients in high‐income countries
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Cochrane database of systematic reviews, December 2011
|
| DOI | 10.1002/14651858.cd006045.pub3 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Erika Ota, Windy MV Wariki, Rintaro Mori, Narumi Hori, Kenji Shibuya |
| Abstract |
Interventions to change behaviour among sex workers and their clients have been identified as a strategy to reduce HIV transmission. However, there has been no systematic review that has examined and summarized their effects. |
X Demographics
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United States | 1 | 33% |
| Japan | 1 | 33% |
| Unknown | 1 | 33% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 2 | 67% |
| Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 1 | 33% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 301 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United Kingdom | 2 | <1% |
| France | 1 | <1% |
| Singapore | 1 | <1% |
| Belgium | 1 | <1% |
| Japan | 1 | <1% |
| United States | 1 | <1% |
| Unknown | 294 | 98% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Master | 73 | 24% |
| Researcher | 44 | 15% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 35 | 12% |
| Other | 21 | 7% |
| Student > Bachelor | 20 | 7% |
| Other | 47 | 16% |
| Unknown | 61 | 20% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Medicine and Dentistry | 105 | 35% |
| Social Sciences | 39 | 13% |
| Nursing and Health Professions | 33 | 11% |
| Psychology | 22 | 7% |
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 8 | 3% |
| Other | 21 | 7% |
| Unknown | 73 | 24% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 12. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 21 November 2019.
All research outputs
#3,188,021
of 26,150,873 outputs
Outputs from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#5,791
of 13,188 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#23,055
of 250,858 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#74
of 212 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 26,150,873 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 87th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 13,188 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 34.7. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 56% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 250,858 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 90% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 212 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 65% of its contemporaries.