↓ Skip to main content

Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews

Percutaneous transluminal angioplasty for treatment of chronic cerebrospinal venous insufficiency (CCSVI) in people with multiple sclerosis

Overview of attention for article published in Cochrane database of systematic reviews, May 2019
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (87th percentile)
  • Above-average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (63rd percentile)

Mentioned by

news
1 news outlet
twitter
1 tweeter
facebook
1 Facebook page
wikipedia
1 Wikipedia page

Citations

dimensions_citation
7 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
159 Mendeley
Title
Percutaneous transluminal angioplasty for treatment of chronic cerebrospinal venous insufficiency (CCSVI) in people with multiple sclerosis
Published in
Cochrane database of systematic reviews, May 2019
DOI 10.1002/14651858.cd009903.pub3
Pubmed ID
Authors

Vanitha A Jagannath, Eugenio Pucci, Govindaraj V Asokan, Edward W Robak

Twitter Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 tweeter who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 159 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 159 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 26 16%
Student > Bachelor 22 14%
Researcher 18 11%
Student > Ph. D. Student 17 11%
Student > Doctoral Student 8 5%
Other 19 12%
Unknown 49 31%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 57 36%
Nursing and Health Professions 15 9%
Neuroscience 10 6%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 4 3%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 4 3%
Other 17 11%
Unknown 52 33%

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 16. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 03 February 2020.
All research outputs
#1,356,869
of 16,750,089 outputs
Outputs from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#3,522
of 11,586 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#35,043
of 274,536 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#9
of 22 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 16,750,089 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 91st percentile: it's in the top 10% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 11,586 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 24.4. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 69% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 274,536 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 87% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 22 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 63% of its contemporaries.