↓ Skip to main content

Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews

Prostanoids and their analogues for the treatment of pulmonary hypertension in neonates

Overview of attention for article published in Cochrane database of systematic reviews, October 2019
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Above-average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (53rd percentile)

Mentioned by

twitter
3 tweeters

Citations

dimensions_citation
6 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
115 Mendeley
Title
Prostanoids and their analogues for the treatment of pulmonary hypertension in neonates
Published in
Cochrane database of systematic reviews, October 2019
DOI 10.1002/14651858.cd012963.pub2
Pubmed ID
Authors

Binoy Shivanna, Sharada Gowda, Stephen E Welty, Keith J Barrington, Mohan Pammi

Twitter Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 3 tweeters who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 115 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 115 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Bachelor 14 12%
Student > Master 13 11%
Researcher 11 10%
Student > Postgraduate 10 9%
Student > Ph. D. Student 8 7%
Other 18 16%
Unknown 41 36%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 30 26%
Nursing and Health Professions 12 10%
Social Sciences 5 4%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 4 3%
Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science 3 3%
Other 13 11%
Unknown 48 42%

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 3. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 15 November 2020.
All research outputs
#10,765,685
of 19,404,461 outputs
Outputs from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#9,310
of 11,922 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#128,939
of 284,571 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#21
of 22 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 19,404,461 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 43rd percentile – i.e., 43% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 11,922 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 27.4. This one is in the 21st percentile – i.e., 21% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 284,571 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 53% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 22 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 9th percentile – i.e., 9% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.