↓ Skip to main content

Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews

Anticholinergic therapy for bronchiectasis

Overview of attention for article published in Cochrane database of systematic reviews, April 2001
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Above-average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (59th percentile)

Mentioned by

wikipedia
1 Wikipedia page

Citations

dimensions_citation
43 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
43 Mendeley
citeulike
1 CiteULike
Title
Anticholinergic therapy for bronchiectasis
Published in
Cochrane database of systematic reviews, April 2001
DOI 10.1002/14651858.cd002163
Pubmed ID
Authors

Toby J Lasserson, Kay Holt, David J Evans, Stephen J Milan, Michael Greenstone

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 43 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
New Zealand 1 2%
United States 1 2%
Unknown 41 95%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 11 26%
Researcher 5 12%
Other 3 7%
Student > Ph. D. Student 3 7%
Student > Postgraduate 2 5%
Other 6 14%
Unknown 13 30%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 22 51%
Psychology 2 5%
Nursing and Health Professions 1 2%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 1 2%
Economics, Econometrics and Finance 1 2%
Other 3 7%
Unknown 13 30%

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 3. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 04 October 2019.
All research outputs
#5,045,823
of 15,968,783 outputs
Outputs from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#7,785
of 11,344 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#107,563
of 273,248 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#18
of 19 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 15,968,783 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 48th percentile – i.e., 48% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 11,344 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 23.7. This one is in the 25th percentile – i.e., 25% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 273,248 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 59% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 19 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 5th percentile – i.e., 5% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.