| Title |
Anticholinergic therapy for bronchiectasis
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Cochrane database of systematic reviews, April 2001
|
| DOI | 10.1002/14651858.cd002163 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Toby J Lasserson, Kay Holt, David J Evans, Stephen J Milan, Michael Greenstone |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 46 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| New Zealand | 1 | 2% |
| United States | 1 | 2% |
| Unknown | 44 | 96% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Master | 10 | 22% |
| Researcher | 5 | 11% |
| Other | 3 | 7% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 3 | 7% |
| Student > Postgraduate | 2 | 4% |
| Other | 7 | 15% |
| Unknown | 16 | 35% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Medicine and Dentistry | 21 | 46% |
| Psychology | 2 | 4% |
| Nursing and Health Professions | 1 | 2% |
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 1 | 2% |
| Economics, Econometrics and Finance | 1 | 2% |
| Other | 3 | 7% |
| Unknown | 17 | 37% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 3. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 04 October 2019.
All research outputs
#7,597,583
of 23,166,665 outputs
Outputs from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#9,045
of 12,383 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#13,279
of 40,485 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#18
of 25 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,166,665 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 44th percentile – i.e., 44% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 12,383 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 32.5. This one is in the 21st percentile – i.e., 21% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 40,485 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 10th percentile – i.e., 10% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 25 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 12th percentile – i.e., 12% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.