The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 27 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
|Members of the public||17||63%|
|Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals)||4||15%|
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 364 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
|Readers by professional status||Count||As %|
|Student > Bachelor||42||12%|
|Student > Master||41||11%|
|Readers by discipline||Count||As %|
|Medicine and Dentistry||91||25%|
|Nursing and Health Professions||20||5%|
|Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science||10||3%|
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 28. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 22 August 2022.
All research outputs
of 23,151,189 outputs
Outputs from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
of 12,383 outputs
Outputs of similar age
of 351,692 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
of 192 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,151,189 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 94th percentile: it's in the top 10% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 12,383 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 32.5. This one has done well, scoring higher than 77% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 351,692 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 91% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 192 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 76% of its contemporaries.