↓ Skip to main content

Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews

Interventions to improve psychosocial well‐being in female BRCA‐mutation carriers following risk‐reducing surgery

Overview of attention for article published in Cochrane database of systematic reviews, October 2019
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (82nd percentile)
  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source

Mentioned by

twitter
14 X users
facebook
1 Facebook page
wikipedia
2 Wikipedia pages

Citations

dimensions_citation
17 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
429 Mendeley
Title
Interventions to improve psychosocial well‐being in female BRCA‐mutation carriers following risk‐reducing surgery
Published in
Cochrane database of systematic reviews, October 2019
DOI 10.1002/14651858.cd012894.pub2
Pubmed ID
Authors

Lisa Jeffers, Joanne Reid, Donna Fitzsimons, Patrick J Morrison, Martin Dempster

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 14 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
As of 1 July 2024, you may notice a temporary increase in the numbers of X profiles with Unknown location. Click here to learn more.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 429 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 429 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Bachelor 51 12%
Student > Master 50 12%
Student > Ph. D. Student 32 7%
Researcher 30 7%
Other 25 6%
Other 62 14%
Unknown 179 42%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 69 16%
Nursing and Health Professions 46 11%
Psychology 43 10%
Social Sciences 12 3%
Unspecified 12 3%
Other 58 14%
Unknown 189 44%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 12. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 22 November 2021.
All research outputs
#3,290,881
of 26,314,361 outputs
Outputs from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#5,889
of 13,206 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#64,294
of 369,636 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#104
of 197 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 26,314,361 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 87th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 13,206 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 34.9. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 55% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 369,636 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 82% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 197 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 47th percentile – i.e., 47% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.