↓ Skip to main content

Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews

External drains versus no drains after burr-hole evacuation for the treatment of chronic subdural haematoma in adults

Overview of attention for article published in Cochrane database of systematic reviews, August 2016
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age

Mentioned by

twitter
1 tweeter

Citations

dimensions_citation
29 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
99 Mendeley
Title
External drains versus no drains after burr-hole evacuation for the treatment of chronic subdural haematoma in adults
Published in
Cochrane database of systematic reviews, August 2016
DOI 10.1002/14651858.cd011402.pub2
Pubmed ID
Authors

Deqing Peng, Yongjian Zhu

Twitter Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 tweeter who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 99 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 99 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 19 19%
Researcher 15 15%
Student > Bachelor 12 12%
Student > Ph. D. Student 10 10%
Student > Doctoral Student 9 9%
Other 18 18%
Unknown 16 16%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 34 34%
Nursing and Health Professions 10 10%
Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science 6 6%
Social Sciences 5 5%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 4 4%
Other 14 14%
Unknown 26 26%

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 13 October 2019.
All research outputs
#10,208,668
of 16,018,042 outputs
Outputs from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#9,707
of 11,356 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#162,758
of 275,215 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#20
of 21 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 16,018,042 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 23rd percentile – i.e., 23% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 11,356 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 23.7. This one is in the 9th percentile – i.e., 9% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 275,215 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 32nd percentile – i.e., 32% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 21 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 4th percentile – i.e., 4% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.