↓ Skip to main content

Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews

Clients’ perceptions and experiences of targeted digital communication accessible via mobile devices for reproductive, maternal, newborn, child, and adolescent health: a qualitative evidence synthesis

Overview of attention for article published in Cochrane database of systematic reviews, October 2019
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (90th percentile)
  • Above-average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (61st percentile)

Mentioned by

twitter
41 tweeters
facebook
4 Facebook pages

Citations

dimensions_citation
17 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
352 Mendeley
Title
Clients’ perceptions and experiences of targeted digital communication accessible via mobile devices for reproductive, maternal, newborn, child, and adolescent health: a qualitative evidence synthesis
Published in
Cochrane database of systematic reviews, October 2019
DOI 10.1002/14651858.cd013447
Pubmed ID
Authors

Heather MR Ames, Claire Glenton, Simon Lewin, Tigest Tamrat, Eliud Akama, Natalie Leon

Twitter Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 41 tweeters who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 352 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 352 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 67 19%
Researcher 49 14%
Student > Bachelor 39 11%
Student > Ph. D. Student 33 9%
Other 22 6%
Other 53 15%
Unknown 89 25%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 83 24%
Nursing and Health Professions 66 19%
Social Sciences 30 9%
Psychology 18 5%
Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science 6 2%
Other 49 14%
Unknown 100 28%

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 24. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 31 March 2020.
All research outputs
#996,452
of 17,375,479 outputs
Outputs from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#2,603
of 11,662 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#26,008
of 279,007 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#8
of 18 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 17,375,479 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 94th percentile: it's in the top 10% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 11,662 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 25.0. This one has done well, scoring higher than 77% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 279,007 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 90% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 18 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 61% of its contemporaries.