| Title |
Clients’ perceptions and experiences of targeted digital communication accessible via mobile devices for reproductive, maternal, newborn, child, and adolescent health: a qualitative evidence synthesis
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Cochrane database of systematic reviews, October 2019
|
| DOI | 10.1002/14651858.cd013447 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Heather MR Ames, Claire Glenton, Simon Lewin, Tigest Tamrat, Eliud Akama, Natalie Leon |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 41 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United Kingdom | 5 | 12% |
| Australia | 4 | 10% |
| Ireland | 3 | 7% |
| Spain | 2 | 5% |
| United States | 2 | 5% |
| Canada | 1 | 2% |
| Israel | 1 | 2% |
| South Africa | 1 | 2% |
| India | 1 | 2% |
| Other | 3 | 7% |
| Unknown | 18 | 44% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 27 | 66% |
| Scientists | 9 | 22% |
| Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 5 | 12% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 680 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 680 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Master | 106 | 16% |
| Researcher | 81 | 12% |
| Student > Bachelor | 61 | 9% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 55 | 8% |
| Other | 39 | 6% |
| Other | 93 | 14% |
| Unknown | 245 | 36% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Medicine and Dentistry | 136 | 20% |
| Nursing and Health Professions | 93 | 14% |
| Social Sciences | 47 | 7% |
| Psychology | 38 | 6% |
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 12 | 2% |
| Other | 90 | 13% |
| Unknown | 264 | 39% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 27. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 04 May 2022.
All research outputs
#1,376,178
of 24,620,113 outputs
Outputs from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#3,045
of 12,948 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#30,339
of 360,032 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#57
of 192 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 24,620,113 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 94th percentile: it's in the top 10% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 12,948 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 34.9. This one has done well, scoring higher than 76% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 360,032 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 91% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 192 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 70% of its contemporaries.