↓ Skip to main content

Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews

Semen preparation techniques for intrauterine insemination

Overview of attention for article published in Cochrane database of systematic reviews, October 2019
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Above-average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (62nd percentile)

Mentioned by

twitter
1 tweeter
wikipedia
1 Wikipedia page

Citations

dimensions_citation
3 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
88 Mendeley
Title
Semen preparation techniques for intrauterine insemination
Published in
Cochrane database of systematic reviews, October 2019
DOI 10.1002/14651858.cd004507.pub4
Pubmed ID
Authors

Carolien M. Boomsma, Ben J Cohlen, Cindy Farquhar

Twitter Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 tweeter who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 88 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Iran, Islamic Republic of 1 1%
South Africa 1 1%
Unknown 86 98%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Bachelor 15 17%
Researcher 14 16%
Student > Master 14 16%
Student > Doctoral Student 7 8%
Student > Postgraduate 5 6%
Other 14 16%
Unknown 19 22%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 23 26%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 10 11%
Nursing and Health Professions 6 7%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 5 6%
Social Sciences 4 5%
Other 17 19%
Unknown 23 26%

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 4. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 19 December 2019.
All research outputs
#4,889,023
of 16,427,352 outputs
Outputs from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#7,529
of 11,496 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#101,552
of 275,178 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#15
of 18 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 16,427,352 research outputs across all sources so far. This one has received more attention than most of these and is in the 69th percentile.
So far Altmetric has tracked 11,496 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 24.3. This one is in the 33rd percentile – i.e., 33% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 275,178 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 62% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 18 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 16th percentile – i.e., 16% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.