↓ Skip to main content

Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews

Semen preparation techniques for intrauterine insemination

Overview of attention for article published in Cochrane database of systematic reviews, October 2019
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (87th percentile)
  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source

Mentioned by

news
1 news outlet
twitter
1 X user
wikipedia
1 Wikipedia page

Citations

dimensions_citation
37 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
182 Mendeley
Title
Semen preparation techniques for intrauterine insemination
Published in
Cochrane database of systematic reviews, October 2019
DOI 10.1002/14651858.cd004507.pub4
Pubmed ID
Authors

Carolien M. Boomsma, Ben J Cohlen, Cindy Farquhar

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 X user who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 182 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Iran, Islamic Republic of 1 <1%
South Africa 1 <1%
Unknown 180 99%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 25 14%
Student > Bachelor 23 13%
Researcher 20 11%
Other 16 9%
Student > Ph. D. Student 8 4%
Other 18 10%
Unknown 72 40%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 40 22%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 16 9%
Nursing and Health Professions 8 4%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 7 4%
Social Sciences 4 2%
Other 26 14%
Unknown 81 45%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 16. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 21 September 2022.
All research outputs
#2,277,717
of 25,462,162 outputs
Outputs from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#4,736
of 12,090 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#47,827
of 368,815 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#82
of 157 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,462,162 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 91st percentile: it's in the top 10% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 12,090 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 38.2. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 64% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 368,815 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 87% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 157 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 47th percentile – i.e., 47% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.