↓ Skip to main content

Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews

Inhaled corticosteroids for cystic fibrosis

Overview of attention for article published in Cochrane database of systematic reviews, July 2019
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Above-average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (61st percentile)

Mentioned by

facebook
1 Facebook page
wikipedia
1 Wikipedia page

Citations

dimensions_citation
14 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
166 Mendeley
Title
Inhaled corticosteroids for cystic fibrosis
Published in
Cochrane database of systematic reviews, July 2019
DOI 10.1002/14651858.cd001915.pub6
Pubmed ID
Authors

Ian M Balfour-Lynn, Karen Welch, Sherie Smith

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 166 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United States 1 <1%
India 1 <1%
Unknown 164 99%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Bachelor 25 15%
Student > Master 22 13%
Researcher 19 11%
Student > Ph. D. Student 19 11%
Student > Doctoral Student 10 6%
Other 27 16%
Unknown 44 27%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 58 35%
Nursing and Health Professions 20 12%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 7 4%
Social Sciences 6 4%
Psychology 5 3%
Other 21 13%
Unknown 49 30%

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 4. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 28 July 2020.
All research outputs
#5,793,921
of 18,439,562 outputs
Outputs from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#8,134
of 11,834 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#108,320
of 282,759 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#16
of 18 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 18,439,562 research outputs across all sources so far. This one has received more attention than most of these and is in the 67th percentile.
So far Altmetric has tracked 11,834 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 25.7. This one is in the 30th percentile – i.e., 30% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 282,759 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 61% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 18 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 16th percentile – i.e., 16% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.