| Title |
Active body surface warming systems for preventing complications caused by inadvertent perioperative hypothermia in adults
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Cochrane database of systematic reviews, April 2016
|
| DOI | 10.1002/14651858.cd009016.pub2 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Eva Madrid, Gerard Urrútia, Marta Roqué i Figuls, Hector Pardo‐Hernandez, Juan Manuel Campos, Pilar Paniagua, Luz Maestre, Pablo Alonso‐Coello |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 3 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Canada | 1 | 33% |
| Unknown | 2 | 67% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 3 | 100% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 485 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Chile | 1 | <1% |
| Unknown | 484 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Master | 64 | 13% |
| Student > Bachelor | 51 | 11% |
| Researcher | 38 | 8% |
| Other | 37 | 8% |
| Student > Doctoral Student | 35 | 7% |
| Other | 102 | 21% |
| Unknown | 158 | 33% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Medicine and Dentistry | 151 | 31% |
| Nursing and Health Professions | 80 | 16% |
| Social Sciences | 10 | 2% |
| Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science | 9 | 2% |
| Engineering | 9 | 2% |
| Other | 53 | 11% |
| Unknown | 173 | 36% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 83. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 06 April 2022.
All research outputs
#522,734
of 26,017,215 outputs
Outputs from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#915
of 13,168 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#9,461
of 317,490 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#29
of 285 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 26,017,215 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 97th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 13,168 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 35.9. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 93% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 317,490 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 96% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 285 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 89% of its contemporaries.