↓ Skip to main content

Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews

Mechanical methods for induction of labour

Overview of attention for article published in Cochrane database of systematic reviews, October 2019
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 5% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (94th percentile)
  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (65th percentile)

Mentioned by

news
5 news outlets
twitter
10 tweeters
facebook
7 Facebook pages
wikipedia
1 Wikipedia page

Citations

dimensions_citation
43 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
267 Mendeley
Title
Mechanical methods for induction of labour
Published in
Cochrane database of systematic reviews, October 2019
DOI 10.1002/14651858.cd001233.pub3
Pubmed ID
Authors

Marieke DT de Vaan, Mieke LG ten Eikelder, Marta Jozwiak, Kirsten R Palmer, Miranda Davies-Tuck, Kitty WM Bloemenkamp, Ben Willem J Mol, Michel Boulvain

Twitter Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 10 tweeters who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 267 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 267 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Bachelor 40 15%
Student > Master 38 14%
Researcher 23 9%
Student > Postgraduate 21 8%
Other 13 5%
Other 43 16%
Unknown 89 33%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 101 38%
Nursing and Health Professions 33 12%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 4 1%
Social Sciences 4 1%
Business, Management and Accounting 3 1%
Other 22 8%
Unknown 100 37%

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 51. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 18 November 2022.
All research outputs
#685,559
of 22,551,053 outputs
Outputs from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#1,413
of 12,279 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#18,686
of 355,376 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#8
of 20 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,551,053 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 96th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 12,279 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 30.2. This one has done well, scoring higher than 88% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 355,376 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 94% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 20 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 65% of its contemporaries.