The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 10 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
As of 1 July 2024, you may notice a temporary increase in the numbers of X profiles with Unknown location. Click here to learn more.
| Title |
Mechanical methods for induction of labour
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Cochrane database of systematic reviews, October 2019
|
| DOI | 10.1002/14651858.cd001233.pub3 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Marieke DT de Vaan, Mieke LG ten Eikelder, Marta Jozwiak, Kirsten R Palmer, Miranda Davies-Tuck, Kitty WM Bloemenkamp, Ben Willem J Mol, Michel Boulvain |
X Demographics
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| France | 2 | 20% |
| Spain | 1 | 10% |
| United States | 1 | 10% |
| United Kingdom | 1 | 10% |
| Australia | 1 | 10% |
| New Zealand | 1 | 10% |
| Unknown | 3 | 30% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 8 | 80% |
| Scientists | 2 | 20% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 311 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 311 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Bachelor | 42 | 14% |
| Student > Master | 40 | 13% |
| Researcher | 25 | 8% |
| Student > Postgraduate | 22 | 7% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 16 | 5% |
| Other | 45 | 14% |
| Unknown | 121 | 39% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Medicine and Dentistry | 107 | 34% |
| Nursing and Health Professions | 36 | 12% |
| Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology | 5 | 2% |
| Social Sciences | 4 | 1% |
| Business, Management and Accounting | 3 | <1% |
| Other | 24 | 8% |
| Unknown | 132 | 42% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 53. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 17 April 2023.
All research outputs
#750,149
of 24,309,087 outputs
Outputs from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#1,475
of 12,886 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#17,116
of 360,872 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#26
of 198 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 24,309,087 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 96th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 12,886 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 34.0. This one has done well, scoring higher than 88% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 360,872 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 95% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 198 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 87% of its contemporaries.