| Title |
Peroxisome proliferator‐activated receptor gamma agonists for preventing recurrent stroke and other vascular events in people with stroke or transient ischaemic attack
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Cochrane database of systematic reviews, October 2019
|
| DOI | 10.1002/14651858.cd010693.pub5 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Jia Liu, Lu‐Ning Wang |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 18 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United Kingdom | 6 | 33% |
| El Salvador | 1 | 6% |
| Yemen | 1 | 6% |
| Malaysia | 1 | 6% |
| Brazil | 1 | 6% |
| Mexico | 1 | 6% |
| Kyrgyzstan | 1 | 6% |
| Japan | 1 | 6% |
| Unknown | 5 | 28% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 12 | 67% |
| Scientists | 3 | 17% |
| Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 3 | 17% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 86 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 86 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Master | 14 | 16% |
| Student > Bachelor | 8 | 9% |
| Researcher | 8 | 9% |
| Other | 2 | 2% |
| Student > Postgraduate | 2 | 2% |
| Other | 4 | 5% |
| Unknown | 48 | 56% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Medicine and Dentistry | 15 | 17% |
| Nursing and Health Professions | 9 | 10% |
| Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology | 2 | 2% |
| Linguistics | 1 | 1% |
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 1 | 1% |
| Other | 10 | 12% |
| Unknown | 48 | 56% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 10. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 20 August 2023.
All research outputs
#3,596,366
of 25,632,496 outputs
Outputs from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#6,268
of 13,152 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#71,358
of 367,277 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#112
of 197 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,632,496 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 85th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 13,152 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 35.6. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 52% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 367,277 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 80% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 197 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 43rd percentile – i.e., 43% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.