The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 3 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
As of 1 July 2024, you may notice a temporary increase in the numbers of X profiles with Unknown location. Click here to learn more.
| Title |
Prophylactic versus selective use of surfactant in preventing morbidity and mortality in preterm infants
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Cochrane database of systematic reviews, March 2012
|
| DOI | 10.1002/14651858.cd000510.pub2 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Maria Ximena Rojas‐Reyes, Colin J Morley, Roger Soll |
| Abstract |
Surfactant therapy is effective in improving the outcome of very preterm infants. Trials have studied a wide variety of surfactant preparations used either to prevent or treat respiratory distress syndrome (RDS). In animal models, prophylactic surfactant leads to more homogeneous distribution and less evidence of lung damage. However, administration requires intubation and treatment of infants who will not go on to develop RDS. This is of particular concern with the advent of improved approaches to providing continuous distending pressure, particularly in the form of nasal continuous positive airway pressure (CPAP). |
X Demographics
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 3 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 3 | 100% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 281 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Portugal | 1 | <1% |
| Austria | 1 | <1% |
| South Africa | 1 | <1% |
| Canada | 1 | <1% |
| Peru | 1 | <1% |
| Unknown | 276 | 98% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Bachelor | 33 | 12% |
| Researcher | 31 | 11% |
| Student > Master | 25 | 9% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 13 | 5% |
| Other | 11 | 4% |
| Other | 41 | 15% |
| Unknown | 127 | 45% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Medicine and Dentistry | 93 | 33% |
| Nursing and Health Professions | 14 | 5% |
| Psychology | 8 | 3% |
| Social Sciences | 7 | 2% |
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 5 | 2% |
| Other | 24 | 9% |
| Unknown | 130 | 46% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 17. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 01 September 2021.
All research outputs
#2,133,631
of 25,457,297 outputs
Outputs from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#4,447
of 11,499 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#12,098
of 169,202 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#53
of 178 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,457,297 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 91st percentile: it's in the top 10% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 11,499 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 40.0. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 62% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 169,202 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 92% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 178 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 70% of its contemporaries.