The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 5 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
As of 1 July 2024, you may notice a temporary increase in the numbers of X profiles with Unknown location. Click here to learn more.
| Title |
Co‐bedding in neonatal nursery for promoting growth and neurodevelopment in stable preterm twins
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Cochrane database of systematic reviews, April 2016
|
| DOI | 10.1002/14651858.cd008313.pub3 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Nai Ming Lai, Siew Cheng Foong, Wai Cheng Foong, Kenneth Tan |
X Demographics
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Greece | 1 | 20% |
| Malaysia | 1 | 20% |
| Canada | 1 | 20% |
| Korea, Republic of | 1 | 20% |
| Unknown | 1 | 20% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 4 | 80% |
| Scientists | 1 | 20% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 438 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Indonesia | 1 | <1% |
| Ethiopia | 1 | <1% |
| Netherlands | 1 | <1% |
| South Africa | 1 | <1% |
| Unknown | 434 | 99% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Master | 67 | 15% |
| Researcher | 58 | 13% |
| Student > Bachelor | 51 | 12% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 37 | 8% |
| Student > Doctoral Student | 18 | 4% |
| Other | 73 | 17% |
| Unknown | 134 | 31% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Medicine and Dentistry | 107 | 24% |
| Nursing and Health Professions | 63 | 14% |
| Psychology | 33 | 8% |
| Social Sciences | 23 | 5% |
| Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science | 9 | 2% |
| Other | 52 | 12% |
| Unknown | 151 | 34% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 36. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 04 March 2024.
All research outputs
#1,209,083
of 26,626,138 outputs
Outputs from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#2,306
of 13,249 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#19,664
of 317,085 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#73
of 283 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 26,626,138 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 95th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 13,249 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 35.8. This one has done well, scoring higher than 82% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 317,085 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 93% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 283 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 74% of its contemporaries.