↓ Skip to main content

Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews

Co‐bedding in neonatal nursery for promoting growth and neurodevelopment in stable preterm twins

Overview of attention for article published in Cochrane database of systematic reviews, April 2016
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 5% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (93rd percentile)
  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (74th percentile)

Mentioned by

news
2 news outlets
blogs
1 blog
policy
1 policy source
twitter
6 X users
facebook
3 Facebook pages
wikipedia
2 Wikipedia pages

Citations

dimensions_citation
7 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
427 Mendeley
Title
Co‐bedding in neonatal nursery for promoting growth and neurodevelopment in stable preterm twins
Published in
Cochrane database of systematic reviews, April 2016
DOI 10.1002/14651858.cd008313.pub3
Pubmed ID
Authors

Nai Ming Lai, Siew Cheng Foong, Wai Cheng Foong, Kenneth Tan

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 6 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 427 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Indonesia 1 <1%
Ethiopia 1 <1%
Netherlands 1 <1%
South Africa 1 <1%
Unknown 423 99%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 67 16%
Researcher 52 12%
Student > Bachelor 51 12%
Student > Ph. D. Student 37 9%
Student > Doctoral Student 18 4%
Other 73 17%
Unknown 129 30%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 100 23%
Nursing and Health Professions 64 15%
Psychology 33 8%
Social Sciences 23 5%
Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science 9 2%
Other 52 12%
Unknown 146 34%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 36. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 04 March 2024.
All research outputs
#1,141,588
of 25,806,763 outputs
Outputs from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#2,310
of 13,140 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#19,318
of 316,294 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#72
of 283 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,806,763 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 95th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 13,140 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 35.9. This one has done well, scoring higher than 82% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 316,294 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 93% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 283 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 74% of its contemporaries.