| Title |
Conservative treatment for closed fifth (small finger) metacarpal neck fractures
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Cochrane database of systematic reviews, July 2005
|
| DOI | 10.1002/14651858.cd003210.pub3 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Rudolf W Poolman, J Carel Goslings, Jason Lee, Markwin Statius Muller, E. Ph Steller, Peter AA Struijs |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 5 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Brazil | 1 | 20% |
| United Kingdom | 1 | 20% |
| Unknown | 3 | 60% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 3 | 60% |
| Members of the public | 2 | 40% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 168 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Denmark | 1 | <1% |
| Unknown | 167 | 99% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Master | 24 | 14% |
| Researcher | 21 | 13% |
| Student > Bachelor | 20 | 12% |
| Student > Postgraduate | 13 | 8% |
| Other | 10 | 6% |
| Other | 37 | 22% |
| Unknown | 43 | 26% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Medicine and Dentistry | 68 | 40% |
| Nursing and Health Professions | 21 | 13% |
| Social Sciences | 4 | 2% |
| Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science | 3 | 2% |
| Psychology | 3 | 2% |
| Other | 12 | 7% |
| Unknown | 57 | 34% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 15. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 10 July 2022.
All research outputs
#2,394,791
of 25,457,858 outputs
Outputs from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#4,864
of 11,842 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#4,118
of 69,210 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#8
of 39 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,457,858 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 90th percentile: it's in the top 10% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 11,842 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 38.9. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 60% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 69,210 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 94% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 39 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 79% of its contemporaries.